Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:00:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:00:35 -0500 Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de ([62.52.24.140]:49420 "EHLO dvmwest.gt.owl.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:00:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 20:00:21 +0100 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Data sitting and remaining in Send-Q Message-ID: <20011224200021.F2461@lug-owl.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011224180142.E2461@lug-owl.de> <20011224181031.GA7934@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20011224181031.GA7934@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.4.15-pre2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2001-12-24 19:10:32 +0100, Jos? Luis Domingo L?pez wrote in message <20011224181031.GA7934@localhost>: > On Monday, 24 December 2001, at 18:01:42 +0100, > Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > I've got some problem with a freshly installed Debian sid system. > > It's running with 2.4.16, 2.4.17-rc2 and 2.4.17 (the problem > > appears on all these kernels) and something seems to break ssh. > > > I don't know if this has something to do with your problem, but > bugs.debian.org has a _long_ list of reported bugs for ssh, many of them > with respect to ssh's X-forwarding. Yes, I know, and it's not only connected to X forwording, but also (this is the majority of filed bugs) with ssh's exit behaviour when any processes where started in background. However -- I've got this problem with the running, interactive session. If I make the server to send more than maybe 200 byte or so, the session will hang, with both sides sitting in select, and data on the server's Send-Q... > My own experience with Debian's ssh is that, sooner or later, > X-forwarding fails, with Send-Q (or Recv-Q) in the server side > completely full. The server side was Debian Sid, and client side was > Debian Woody, and it happened with both a simple xclock and gkrellm (ssh > remoteserver xclock, ssh remoteserver gkrellm). Well, my understanding is that, if there's data in any of the queues, these bytes should be delivered. In this case, data is *not* sent over the wire. Is this a kernel bug? ...or is data only transmitted if we're in position to also set the PUSH bit? > However, interactive shells didn't seem to show this problem. Mine does:-( And this is quite annoying, because I'm to present some software on the box in question in some days. But, with no ssh on a (so far) headless box, I'll face some trouble... MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 -- New APT-Proxy written in shell script -- http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/