Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231024-marvell-88e6152-wan-led-v6-0-993ab0949344@linaro.org>
 <20231024-marvell-88e6152-wan-led-v6-1-993ab0949344@linaro.org>
 <169815156038.3447619.17571704457000261488.robh@kernel.org>
 <CACRpkdZMSfKYaXR9NWpvca094=Prc6N8ZfR+QMcfS6VQ-prQRA@mail.gmail.com> <20231024201024.6cyoqy5vbctbgtfe@skbuf>
In-Reply-To: <20231024201024.6cyoqy5vbctbgtfe@skbuf>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:38:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb2TRa4v9Phv0Qf3oDz8hAiwsmnSq7oU2dXarHoYZVyVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Require ports or ethernet-ports
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?TWFyZWsgQmVow7pu?= <kabel@kernel.org>,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:10=E2=80=AFPM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com=
> wrote:

> FWIW, we have a rule in Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst to
> not repost more frequently than once every 24 hours. Unfortunately I
> don't have a huge review capacity right now, so in my case it could
> probably take even a bit more than that. But it's a bit unpleasant that
> I left some feedback on v4, you posted v5 yesterday and since then we're
> now at v7, only for me to find that I need to repeat my v4 feedback.

I'm sorry, too enthusiastic.
I'll try to pace it down, the patches will not be for v6.7 anyway.

Yours,
Linus Walleij