Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:32:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:31:50 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:45062 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:31:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 19:31:24 +0000 From: Russell King To: Alan Cox Cc: Doug Ledford , Keith Owens , Benjamin LaHaise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Assigning syscall numbers for testing Message-ID: <20011224193124.F2110@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <3C2770FE.80403@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 07:05:31PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 07:05:31PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > it. However, I think it needs to be allocated *regardless* of whether Linus > > takes the patch into his kernel. Even if the patch is simply used outside > > Linus's kernel, it still needs the allocation to truly be safe. > > Negative numbers are safe until Linus has 2^31 syscalls, at which point > quite frankly we would have a few other problems including the fact that > the syscall table won't fit in kernel mapped memory. Please leave the allocation of the exact number space to the port maintainers discression. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/