Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230928151846.8229-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com> <305b4dec-c99d-3cee-4563-8d7dcbae9384@ghiti.fr>
 <20231003090443.67a2e2692b68211e05b53248@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20231003090443.67a2e2692b68211e05b53248@linux-foundation.org>
From:   Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:57:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHVXubi5C0hBaXx5tqVHZAJSd1zvHRqoxUEkk9ZbmZ5mq2=mAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes 0/2] Fix set_huge_pte_at()
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Qinglin Pan <panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn>,
        Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Andrew,

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:04=E2=80=AFPM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation=
.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:43:10 +0200 Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>
> > +cc Andrew: Would  you mind taking this patchset in your tree for the
> > next rc? This patchset depends on a previous fix for arm64 that you
> > merged in rc4 which is not in the riscv -fixes branch yet.
> >
> > I saw with Palmer and he should ack this shortly.
>
> Well I grabbed them into mm.git's mm-hotfixes-unstable queue.  All
> being well I'll move them into mm-hotfixes-stable within a week then
> into Linus shortly after.

Those fixes finally did not make it to 6.6, I was hoping for them to
land in -rc6 or -rc7: for the future, what should have I done to avoid
that?

Thanks,

Alex

>
> Unless something changes.  It's odd that the riscv tree(s) aren't set
> up to merge fixes against -rc4?