Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764908AbXKUAhJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:37:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754503AbXKUAg5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:36:57 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:59564 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752791AbXKUAg4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:36:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:36:29 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Mark Lord , Arjan van de Ven , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ? Message-ID: <20071121003629.GA20765@elte.hu> References: <200711201837.39664.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20071120064747.2a8036cd@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20071120220110.GF24156@elte.hu> <47436C43.6010200@rtr.ca> <20071120232723.GB23667@elte.hu> <47436ECD.3050004@zytor.com> <20071120234725.GH23667@elte.hu> <474372BC.2000609@zytor.com> <20071121000742.GN23667@elte.hu> <474379C1.2040703@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <474379C1.2040703@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1557 Lines: 39 * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >>>>> Nope. It runs inside an initramfs, of course; that initramfs is linked >>>>> into the kernel binary. >>>> would be nice to have a single-image variant for all of this. having the >>>> separate initrd was always trouble - and it's pointless as well. (we >>>> rarely update the initrd without updating the vmlinuz as well) >>> We do. Am I missing something? >> >> do we have a single-image way of getting both the kernel image and the >> initram set up at once? What i know of is a two-image approach: vmlinuz >> and initrd. >> > > Yes, we do. The initramfs can be linked into the kernel image. The > unified klibc build tree does that by default. argh. Guess i misread your answer: >>>>>> nor do i - i was under the impression that klibc was able to work >>>>>> out of a bzImage too? Am i wrong? >>>>> Nope. It runs inside an initramfs, of course; that initramfs is linked >>>>> into the kernel binary. i took that "Nope" as referring to my impression - but you in fact meant that i am not wrong? :-) So nothing to see here. single-bzImage initrd was and is possible, so we could in fact move chunks of system-related userland (such as irqbalanced) into the kernel proper? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/