Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:8 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:8;
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 05:54:29 -0700
From:   Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@marvell.com>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <rric@kernel.org>, <cchavva@marvell.com>, <sgarapati@marvell.com>,
        <jannadurai@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: thunderx: Marvell thunderx i2c changes
Message-ID: <20231026125429.GA22428@Dell2s-9>
References: <20230728120004.19680-1-pmalgujar@marvell.com>
 <20231024201440.ey7pjah7fq33mbwm@zenone.zhora.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231024201440.ey7pjah7fq33mbwm@zenone.zhora.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:14:40PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Piyush,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 05:00:00AM -0700, Piyush Malgujar wrote:
> > The changes are for Marvell OcteonTX2 SOC family:
> > 
> > - Handling clock divisor logic using subsytem ID
> > - Support for high speed mode
> > - Handle watchdog timeout
> > - Added ioclk support
> > 
> > Changes since V1:
> > - Addressed comments, added defines as required
> > - Removed unnecessary code
> > - Added a patch to support ioclk if sclk not present in ACPI table
> > 
> > Piyush Malgujar (1):
> >   i2c: thunderx: Adding ioclk support
> > 
> > Suneel Garapati (3):
> >   i2c: thunderx: Clock divisor logic changes
> >   i2c: thunderx: Add support for High speed mode
> >   i2c: octeon: Handle watchdog timeout
> > 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c     | 96 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.h     | 27 +++++++
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-thunderx-pcidrv.c | 23 ++++--
> >  3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> I was going through the patches that failed to receive an answer,
> is this series still valid? Do you still need a round of review
> here?
> 
> Andi

Hi Andi,

Yes, these patches are still valid. These have been acked by you
and were waiting to get reply from Robert.
Please review the patches.

Thanks,
Piyush