Received: by 2002:a05:7412:a9a2:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id o34csp440868rdh; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 06:34:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHdqmuQIxU7NWyrR53Ti/vWjdBnDEkbCDQn8aJSE06NAcsJuOsjPI0jEP2nVaCsueowXgGA X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d5d0:0:b0:5a7:d9e6:8fd4 with SMTP id x199-20020a0dd5d0000000b005a7d9e68fd4mr21115306ywd.12.1698327287123; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 06:34:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1698327287; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cQRnXmStgVC19Klqve8gDw65LzwNsE7it5Vnb0AU8MTOU39Xid8TlHnfRWsST15c8s tI9U3OmcQgQX2EXB/gtMS1eElOdaWUrzdRuBA0R1Zk4uZ4bEo3kErWKmQafw27cwdisT 8gkg7rV/wVQgCf7cSrL2uTsXTreAaeLnClGEuK0WMN922Z4LpAWp+3GpqIyb3E+oqBup VSQvimVxGPSMBxxK4JdYBJWARKSEkDemqZ2TNniKuIDOquO5pSohc66AF43FLwfvAlof OwBCvRBGP2eV/ESLfkCp44LK8IN0y+1H0QupM4v1qe01eEsF+xhIPzf4mOnUXqknlOAm jgdg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:organization:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=ksTN1cHmve1TMKjQnsr8NNwTtq/ilr6xRQMEaQtCr38=; fh=QEGGfnzgLB1PJNzeZDNHIJJxryNQqqD8yjdtP5TLpzQ=; b=Z+SoC7cjyrCr9TMXCZMvKNdS7yfRMTxhZWzITd/0BQOy6+wOTCGWQEgv0eZScklH3t 7nCDuTKz0xZY3AW7TEB8ITEz+hM6a0gmTGUnxVPHrTxACum6nweOX+bVptQ4jn+DmtyE 7ixwqv9sVyHv7gLyg2gpYCwtpkG2p89+GR6Bp/iEjXfaC4XiNEQe7jxKjohMWrD3Kjym qCPmsCbZMg/B2UuAZejd+wQCAWuMiFPYBGoaVxIF9p7KobZuAAskGa2jyUZByro8obXe lSRRGCQAMPiBpZc0LDyjRK/MlPUdcZ6q7KcyipWCpCkGX4kLTyxwxlGnQl/Oehu92SZa wtOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=QWwE57Ov; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from howler.vger.email (howler.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n5-20020a817205000000b005a7a8377e1asi14298171ywc.115.2023.10.26.06.34.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Oct 2023 06:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=QWwE57Ov; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by howler.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206E1801F115; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 06:34:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at howler.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231180AbjJZNef (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:34:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59482 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230177AbjJZNee (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:34:34 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA10187 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 06:34:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698327272; x=1729863272; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wm/QjKsX2coLFHQLx9Lmre73K6QbB6YsB2skPvgcWKI=; b=QWwE57Ova8d62CeOhhvlISuUr9jFl74Aae1bPnUTsPTG3gsqs4Uj3IXe LGZ6IqN0IXvZ84pmkG+rqmYZqeYAiBOdpvaxcg66WUzTxHPTR5/oVtWPX KObd3hDkBGfG9Irxslg1Z85gXHEe9mgM9aZNdghlBnHW7K2b7bT7ptRch OzmZ5tzAgrobwGvfUq0FivrOrJW3ARGtFdb6e9UZnujko0Z2cj6MD8I0E +C9KqzQgkijKRKF6BJMEtv4tARm41Nn9dZOCnP0S6gpH2cdXBtx4t59cR 6XzcX5/IR99f9wC8iINIImQjdyi8Dr5XU8xj+xFkOli20ScQ7eyUGFJ3t g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10875"; a="377916336" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,253,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="377916336" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2023 06:34:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10875"; a="882832954" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,253,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="882832954" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2023 06:34:28 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97-RC3) (envelope-from ) id 1qw0VE-00000008ruy-3jh7; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:34:24 +0300 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:34:24 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Alexander Potapenko Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, pcc@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yury.norov@gmail.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, eugenis@google.com, syednwaris@gmail.com, william.gray@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] lib/bitmap: add bitmap_{read,write}() Message-ID: References: <20231025083812.456916-1-glider@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on howler.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (howler.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 26 Oct 2023 06:34:44 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 03:28:25PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote: ... > > I still didn't get the grouping you implied with this... > > Given your second reply, I can disregard this one, right? Yes. ... > > > + if (unlikely(!nbits || nbits > BITS_PER_LONG)) > > > + return 0; > > > > ...this return in the Return section. > > > > Parameter description for @nbits actually mentions BITS_PER_LONG > already, so would it be ok to drop the Note: and extend the Returns: > section as follows: > > + * Returns: value of nbits located at the @start bit offset within the @map > + * memory region. For @nbits = 0 and @nbits > BITS_PER_LONG the return value > + * is undefined. > > ? Fine to me. > (Yury didn't want the zero return value to be part of the contract here). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko