Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:8 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:8;
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 11:51:50 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
        Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/21] irqchip: riscv-intc: Add ACPI support for
 AIA
Message-ID: <20231026165150.GA1825130@bhelgaas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231025202344.581132-14-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 01:53:36AM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> The RINTC subtype structure in MADT also has information about other
> interrupt controllers like MMIO. So, save those information and provide
> interfaces to retrieve them when required by corresponding drivers.

> @@ -218,7 +306,19 @@ static int __init riscv_intc_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,

> +	 * MSI controller (IMSIC) in RISC-V is optional. So, unless
> +	 * IMSIC is discovered, set system wide MSI support as
> +	 * unsupported. Once IMSIC is probed, MSI support will be set.
> +	 */
> +	pci_no_msi();

It doesn't seem like we should have to tell the PCI core about
functionality we *don't* have.

I would think IMSIC would be detected before enumerating PCI devices
that might use it, and if we *haven't* found an IMSIC by the time we
get to pci_register_host_bridge(), would/should we set
PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI there?

I see Thomas is cc'd; he'd have better insight.

Bjorn