Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:45:49 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org,
        bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, willy@infradead.org, mgorman@suse.de,
        jon.grimm@amd.com, bharata@amd.com, raghavendra.kt@amd.com,
        boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
        jgross@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@chromium.org>,
        Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@google.com>,
        Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [POC][RFC][PATCH v2] sched: Extended Scheduler Time Slice
Message-ID: <20231026164549.14d45c60@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <7871472b-a0c4-4475-9671-69a3244f956d@efficios.com>
References: <20231025235413.597287e1@gandalf.local.home>
        <20231026105944.GJ33965@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
        <20231026071413.4ed47b0e@gandalf.local.home>
        <f5b0fffa-423a-4571-be6c-383399274328@efficios.com>
        <CAHk-=whnyt2TccpDaWGTbDsVkKApL3c2FtDPMEwuTmeu_cEL8Q@mail.gmail.com>
        <7871472b-a0c4-4475-9671-69a3244f956d@efficios.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:59:13 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:

> > for a rough implementation of a 'xchg()' without SMP coherency, just
> > cpu-local one (ie atomic wrt being preempted by the kernel, but not
> > atomic wrt other CPU's accessing the same variable concurrently)  
> 
> Actually Steven does not need a xchg to test-and-set a single bit which
> is only accessed concurrently between kernel and userspace from the same
> thread. Either "bts" or "andb" should work fine.

Hmm, how would bts work? Doesn't that just set a bit?

I need to clear one bit while seeing if another bit is set. I could also
use subl, as that would also atomically clear the bit.

-- Steve