Received: by 2002:a05:7412:a9a2:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id o34csp985058rdh; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:59:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGfl2M6mpEpBVG1wc+Un46OPbSPWmpeqiyn0JCfqF6SYs57qgI/hGBQbQ7yX8guh+5qajF3 X-Received: by 2002:a25:c750:0:b0:d9c:f4ce:28c with SMTP id w77-20020a25c750000000b00d9cf4ce028cmr1786774ybe.12.1698393594011; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:59:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1698393593; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lOoVUOzH9TUVyArbCM6kgRVsohAym/k4zlAp9zlB0YAMPrPeOaKOov5w60APL+cYXm Zn28hrnjRVyqJDH7PBstK3co1OrOoGOjD9NRjP0fjldTXic65UvOJC90QcqhuBLzZoBL 6hZUrnnsNkN5qPck4H/YZwbAJKE42jQpSIiF8GveAIFQgDFMh/5O15sCUJWcP//rIgMV krInTxQ9DyMl516o9Ia9QhIOjMNtIOLG/xhx4TJaHJoiD9oC1tVRh+Y2PK+o2DlbzGpV s2l4nWq61QFA4s6m5FRpcLPDmEvUN4v7ROkmqBETkIqmx7Owh0E9Hp647apQW+xrmIcI Y+Mg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=aOK7A0+CdflYOBnvO1eKKbv3VLmXZEl1oDj0wejWb7w=; fh=blI4AWPGXI0lJ/gzDOdJpTbU8CSNRaNes1L743LY7Qg=; b=KP5czbNUA9w6ofALmyA0APv+Eq6hxS/ijrIWAsbtqzF6QjdDjx3mQmR9yRjYZYWC1s V6+ExVUTjJPnzOnH6RUGHWOVEDFzw9uIhOaHON8Q8XmuJbO4RZCAnBJt+pwNxA8T8WKq HnEeFnwWgokI8PmzjgK1fQYwQVeCgjKk+mNdks23ptLrT+D3X/wA0rJwIEqKPLuXJ5cb W9ZUfMnf0t8dvDQfZM9O5J9jRL08mN612+G6h37HYfsbHyZn0jalcAyRr7bCe9zSQd/K rSE7/BIH+LWZVQZVJ8jXsBNm+EQZZSN34wL+bA8UW0YN+lPk0a1igc85WDxR6Ce3q1D+ 4hew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=U3KBVLxE; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=p+PouVqq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from agentk.vger.email (agentk.vger.email. [23.128.96.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 67-20020a251046000000b00da05bef4335si1755044ybq.114.2023.10.27.00.59.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=U3KBVLxE; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=p+PouVqq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by agentk.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799CC80CA0AA; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:59:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at agentk.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231233AbjJ0H7p (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:59:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230523AbjJ0H7o (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:59:44 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B300111; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:59:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1698393580; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aOK7A0+CdflYOBnvO1eKKbv3VLmXZEl1oDj0wejWb7w=; b=U3KBVLxElVmocznmPNDgJZtMo4VLmm2nd4LaDnabibfZIjHeIXVWV6H/8HzLdMtAdQXCi5 DzyHMeICFUFGqr6AK5eZ8Uv49cXILfyzxHIzbyoZR4U6oi8+jRb79gYZQReiG7Hg1Bvjt4 7aknQauCBlKL3NR3GyI7Ixp+b2fxXQXqUvkY0eU2a+L/Pi4pSbhQByPWlkKn7326JhAeQ8 2+1iwInpzWBCPbVzI0uXAXKj2CBvOP6bvgVZ/cZPcY2Kenz99llr0oYsEMphhc3aWOJUt+ hkxUoE/TMxHOkgCGYNLQXKQEB5rcZ1yaLRniTeo/6xWPCqZYuH9ilqHnRaUQrw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1698393580; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aOK7A0+CdflYOBnvO1eKKbv3VLmXZEl1oDj0wejWb7w=; b=p+PouVqqHVKIXhO4ioC+yLKjjEE/QX88ImmuCIA9EcgteoMBReRCHxJhi3s8GuV2dIYbqI JMnXP5hdx90+uDBQ== To: Anup Patel , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Rowand Cc: Conor Dooley , Marc Zyngier , =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Atish Patra , Andrew Jones , Sunil V L , Saravana Kannan , Anup Patel , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel , Atish Patra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] RISC-V: Don't fail in riscv_of_parent_hartid() for disabled HARTs In-Reply-To: <20231025142820.390238-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com> References: <20231025142820.390238-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> <20231025142820.390238-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:59:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87y1fo3383.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on agentk.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (agentk.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:59:51 -0700 (PDT) On Wed, Oct 25 2023 at 19:58, Anup Patel wrote: > The riscv_of_processor_hartid() used by riscv_of_parent_hartid() fails > for HARTs disabled in the DT. This results in the following warning > thrown by the RISC-V INTC driver for the E-core on SiFive boards: > > [ 0.000000] riscv-intc: unable to find hart id for /cpus/cpu@0/interrupt-controller > > The riscv_of_parent_hartid() is only expected to read the hartid from > the DT so we should directly call of_get_cpu_hwid() instead of calling We should? Or maybe not? Please write precise changelogs and use imperative wording as documented in Documentation/process.