Received: by 2002:a05:7412:a9a2:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id o34csp1078504rdh; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:19:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEaXEoCayUw0cv9kfdyd4It8jPX9Q2GYFcT/CgGb8cVrW4mZn8+1/X6OfN9WVPJWwam1Sxn X-Received: by 2002:a54:480e:0:b0:3a9:ba39:6d6e with SMTP id j14-20020a54480e000000b003a9ba396d6emr2281962oij.0.1698405561935; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:19:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1698405561; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=X2TibUBppQ20eN7KcYO8a03LwYuRkgctqLjaCQNOxBpyhxMfVxIcqac4Y9gXZZhSEr YtfXOHh+lPq17WP+TFgazg/o6uE7ad3BiwUjum2giYo0Q/bI/7Ytvf5k25tLBr5xYSTB 1gkxhDV8RcBeltNlLWphOlczxIAwmXFFn+t/iECS8HCQIh/J3sbq5J/lGr83dz/TDpcH 6zEYsAHqHADpeO958lpm6NGo5vuOmCPe9LGg704E9/wCs5haB6u+qREng8ryJYYMGn7g XZNAwLQnBGmEcY+P9EF+xI7HlgZklqsRsGRnmkYynKtMLjPbHzAmHTIQE6SfhLKEkQbt TgSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:dkim-signature; bh=mwipWYAVb8YaWAy/RpG5D3vAZ+ckCTcTj/JKsmqJc4M=; fh=s5lIWcbpKK8Tromv+deT36LIV6haWFg+xqhLO00Xsok=; b=taaOpWCyg1fjsnT7wMWGAsG+VPJJDJoqgaet0yYI+qr4qwFrcu5iK1KMVMjsV0HR4w deyHX+CSurOOre8HVw3QQS1bR+vfUvLM0pwJWG+3Ak6MBP+qpUNBZCWtLdgjqgW9M7xB gp2HR+S4t40/woXg/xCP5sovOlQlwmAPMZNpQqhm4k7g/MFwDD+U/pRnI/60OiTsVTaX hri9tqojlcfaxhG33twHeuPN1uglqG1H5EsYbIDmmdyhHIufzVyiSLy0QjsUOHoE7mb/ tkZTUbrZ114Mzbfy2Ncq4hm8AtxNnhQDK2kdzviwS/Me99Tk00eVeONWnKirKpsICV8E IhzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=ZFJ712XH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from snail.vger.email (snail.vger.email. [23.128.96.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v191-20020a2548c8000000b00d9ab70c67fdsi2100947yba.212.2023.10.27.04.19.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=ZFJ712XH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by snail.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D4982F4E25; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:19:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at snail.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345539AbjJ0LTR (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:19:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33728 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231461AbjJ0LTQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:19:16 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48493129; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 39RBEDLi005170; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=mwipWYAVb8YaWAy/RpG5D3vAZ+ckCTcTj/JKsmqJc4M=; b=ZFJ712XHZ0c46ZTVVSQfvlioGqkyPZc0dRwu6RVJnRtLg7icQ1aLvBwSWNAjh1NVptVA Df2k9ik+I++xOr3vSVrUvik7DOvZvwBkuEUco2ftjSSJ/g741cfDsblYkaXLyIuV5Bog j/l/ZLyygHEMLOxJu1yFtN7KWVtKvi/l0ZSgLHL2g1++9IULlbRfXySpzLSBSXx0nosH zYMIOnPtdNJzbc6aiFo/qrd4eit01UbJyRhZSpbIwA6MRY88+CoddbGyqIYTo0ok7Q2X NovwQhZvmroEzfBGScN092FOy/uaNR+j3qK5Pdm5rNJsFAIr+ArXTYBdD3IfsiYL/+GD sw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u0c5c876s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:13 +0000 Received: from m0360072.ppops.net (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 39RBGMqB017526; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:12 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u0c5c8764-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:12 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 39RASYvb021676; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:12 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3tywqscm1u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:11 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 39RBJ8Xw11404028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:08 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FE620049; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E80C20040; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-ce58cfcc-320b-11b2-a85c-85e19b5285e0 (unknown [9.152.224.212]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:19:04 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: Tony Krowiak Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, Halil Pasic Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure Message-ID: <20231027131904.165c7ad6.pasic@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20231026183250.254432-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> References: <20231026183250.254432-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20231026183250.254432-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 52nVs5n_SCS3dPxZrNsNAdG5zGzKC9-Y X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: HUKW71VpXsQDYvGEU7jQF_dKpoDEdBMU X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.987,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-10-27_09,2023-10-27_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=998 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2310240000 definitions=main-2310270098 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (snail.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:19:20 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:32:44 -0400 Tony Krowiak wrote: > Since this scenario is very unlikely to happen and there is no status > response code to indicate an invalid ISC value, let's set the Again invalid ISC won't happen except for hypervisor messes up. > response code to 06 indicating 'Invalid address of AP-queue notification > byte'. While this is not entirely accurate, it is better than indicating > that the ZONE/GISA designation is invalid which is something the guest > can do nothing about since those values are set by the hypervisor. And more importantly AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_GISA is not valid for G2 in the given scenario, since G2 is not trying to set up interrupts on behalf of the G3 with a G3 GISA, but G2 is trying to set up interrupts for itself. And then AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_GISA is architecturally simply not a valid RC! > > Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak > Suggested-by: Halil Pasic Except for the explanation in the commit message, the patch is good. It is up to you if you want to fix the commit message or not. Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic