Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34;
Message-ID: <ab671f50-7a0f-4e72-98a0-fa4d5f2ed889@tweaklogic.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:12:11 +1030
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: light: Add support for APDS9306 Light Sensor
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Paul Gazzillo <paul@pgazz.com>
Cc:     Matt Ranostay <matt@ranostay.sg>,
        Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@axis.com>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20231027074545.6055-1-subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com>
 <20231027074545.6055-3-subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com>
 <d7ba077d-6bcd-4e04-b678-51e4bbc935ca@linaro.org>
 <9e55b561-a0ad-4503-9f20-b7c98507afa0@tweaklogic.com>
 <ebcf3e9f-2bc2-4d91-8b5c-51405236e4ab@linaro.org>
From:   Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <ebcf3e9f-2bc2-4d91-8b5c-51405236e4ab@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 27/10/23 21:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/10/2023 10:42, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
>> 4. Conor reviewed the patch and said that it would be better that I handle all
>>      these operations in apds9306 driver (this) patch series rather than submitting
>>      a new patch.
>>      "Ahh apologies then. The best course of action would likely be to include
>>       the patch merging the two bindings in your series adding the third user."
>> 5. As per this patch series -- RFC->v0->v1-v2
> 
> RFC was the first version sent to mailing list. So after RFC there is
> second version - v2. This is v4.

Acknowledging all your other comments. Appreciate your time and effort in reviewing
this. One last question on this - So what version should I use for the patchset
which I will submit next - "v3" or "v5" in the Subject of the emails?

Regards,
Subhajit Ghosh