Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@amd.com>
To:     <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
CC:     <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <brett.creeley@amd.com>, <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 vfio 2/3] pds/vfio: Fix mutex lock->magic != lock warning
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:36:50 -0700
Message-ID: <20231027223651.36047-3-brett.creeley@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231027223651.36047-1-brett.creeley@amd.com>
References: <20231027223651.36047-1-brett.creeley@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2023 22:37:14.2271
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 39fc8e2c-2b7b-4663-57f2-08dbd73d4459
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL6PEPF0001AB4E.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ2PR12MB8112
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on pete.vger.email
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (pete.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:37:58 -0700 (PDT)

The following BUG was found when running on a kernel with
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y set:

DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
RIP: 0010:mutex_trylock+0x10d/0x120
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? __warn+0x85/0x140
 ? mutex_trylock+0x10d/0x120
 ? report_bug+0xfc/0x1e0
 ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
 ? mutex_trylock+0x10d/0x120
 ? mutex_trylock+0x10d/0x120
 pds_vfio_reset+0x3a/0x60 [pds_vfio_pci]
 pci_reset_function+0x4b/0x70
 reset_store+0x5b/0xa0
 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x137/0x1d0
 vfs_write+0x2de/0x410
 ksys_write+0x5d/0xd0
 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8

As shown, lock->magic != lock. This is because
mutex_init(&pds_vfio->state_mutex) is called in the VFIO open path. So,
if a reset is initiated before the VFIO device is opened the mutex will
have never been initialized. Fix this by calling
mutex_init(&pds_vfio->state_mutex) in the VFIO init path.

Also, don't destroy the mutex on close because the device may
be re-opened, which would cause mutex to be uninitialized. Fix this by
implementing a driver specific vfio_device_ops.release callback that
destroys the mutex before calling vfio_pci_core_release_dev().

Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/pci/pds/vfio_dev.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/pds/vfio_dev.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/pds/vfio_dev.c
index c351f588fa13..306b1c25f016 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/pds/vfio_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/pds/vfio_dev.c
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ static int pds_vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 
 	pds_vfio->vf_id = vf_id;
 
+	mutex_init(&pds_vfio->state_mutex);
 	spin_lock_init(&pds_vfio->reset_lock);
 
 	vdev->migration_flags = VFIO_MIGRATION_STOP_COPY | VFIO_MIGRATION_P2P;
@@ -170,6 +171,16 @@ static int pds_vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void pds_vfio_release_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
+{
+	struct pds_vfio_pci_device *pds_vfio =
+		container_of(vdev, struct pds_vfio_pci_device,
+			     vfio_coredev.vdev);
+
+	mutex_destroy(&pds_vfio->state_mutex);
+	vfio_pci_core_release_dev(vdev);
+}
+
 static int pds_vfio_open_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct pds_vfio_pci_device *pds_vfio =
@@ -181,7 +192,6 @@ static int pds_vfio_open_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	mutex_init(&pds_vfio->state_mutex);
 	pds_vfio->state = VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING;
 	pds_vfio->deferred_reset_state = VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING;
 
@@ -201,14 +211,13 @@ static void pds_vfio_close_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 	pds_vfio_put_save_file(pds_vfio);
 	pds_vfio_dirty_disable(pds_vfio, true);
 	mutex_unlock(&pds_vfio->state_mutex);
-	mutex_destroy(&pds_vfio->state_mutex);
 	vfio_pci_core_close_device(vdev);
 }
 
 static const struct vfio_device_ops pds_vfio_ops = {
 	.name = "pds-vfio",
 	.init = pds_vfio_init_device,
-	.release = vfio_pci_core_release_dev,
+	.release = pds_vfio_release_device,
 	.open_device = pds_vfio_open_device,
 	.close_device = pds_vfio_close_device,
 	.ioctl = vfio_pci_core_ioctl,
-- 
2.17.1