Received: by 2002:a05:7412:a9a2:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id o34csp2149640rdh; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:06:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGgQzFZ2XET1q0hH7Vs/byNGBXyk4aybsR6Z0ORUhlJhJokCw6562vz5omwllBJ1NsCXIV2 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:19f:b0:15a:6733:24e2 with SMTP id le31-20020a056a21019f00b0015a673324e2mr13634528pzb.25.1698573984612; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:06:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1698573984; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XDDXWXQliiFP3YWZSiZrLJIghQyagJUttTBcg5IDTDSGbrtlak4ftmedycF1gQVePR cZLAcqgw16AIXHb5AVyWcZO4stswAfI27buhBkBMcpE9yXOVaebxiSBFJYwGjQ6LVge7 BsQOrdKskVJzye9LYPAQnrriw6nsds4sv36yiQnh+1xDY92x6ASYU2BFPs06lHPEpFK4 zZUwTBap5G+IJC0+U2NqupikhSfs7IGn04/eeLDq9zViZ/3GRGN1lgv+Kt+sVUcA0P0H FXGmZoIizN6E7rVdx+pUpON4D0Ro1L4MvxgfscmhGV6otf3Ij3EiCwGsF0NPros1ZxOY 4XXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=7QSWeedgx1l2ZvSn7WS7XBKDc30qjSx4L6cpLyuAiXw=; fh=f2Z5cxFTNRqYj82Xizu5WVDMphwrT6Iz8CWGm1jO3Wk=; b=gilg2UNUR+YBJ8YkdhRDpDVZ2e/SL4mwE9BpPDqCPGTviSkR71L8DmMnutMIXRJ0LE 8wPUUEBJqt5eugFvNHIamcfyv0dRfh5vDK2vAwxwI/CV5EFXv5JSGvj/BCHYKqMmvpcS M1kllCGyXc6X49YKamxBsCryqOBXu889SmhY914xtsNLTRwVjAqWo06mxXMeJkDnmKf+ 8sBhsu9gGDw676yMXpkUCyBW7VxGxc5mfrn8IAs+N/2DGw/vN3Nm80q2fOyULlrauruT aVoOwVsEJlb73RpGFdIczBG2sf+Fn9q0WaDR6BfpfEPkIJbjv0y6Hyk3ykRqP+9AbBbZ ftiw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="WdM/tIsq"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from groat.vger.email (groat.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z4-20020a63c044000000b00565dd108fd4si3443899pgi.115.2023.10.29.03.06.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="WdM/tIsq"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by groat.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488088088A5E; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:06:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at groat.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229529AbjJ2KGG (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 29 Oct 2023 06:06:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48696 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229446AbjJ2KGF (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2023 06:06:05 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BABBB0 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:06:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698573963; x=1730109963; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=22IFjif+Zaay2bxS/UIgYdVCPDzNfUS2BDcTun2d/kY=; b=WdM/tIsqlpvQO5cflpyW/nMQISGyjoED2eCuFKdXwsX3QjsiCnIsCDOp 8y6sDbuOF5vh3vqkcEfYtpXYSuNvrlyj62Pd2txeOGc0O0ZAgoTLl6ZD5 jjEZFdo9ISix7HJOBeH9sQI+mTVEGroSHblfgS8FA2x9b+gLlzn67o3Ob wAfJWmoBU3XDkVZMzG0clJNUXjpCQcPVcip7Ny6+oFQ2iw8LRr8tqAnjU CYQi5Y8gzYTP0XJPCZ9LJVfH/52aicKn7tiJ74MR6F5dCL/nDJPOjSEBj cBu27dJCQGf3xOv5Q/gJe22Fc8KsxpxOOkq96Qz10CQwRnHcvzMZZHVAu A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10877"; a="6573438" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,261,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="6573438" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2023 03:06:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10877"; a="753534148" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,261,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="753534148" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 8917679a5d3e) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2023 03:05:56 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 8917679a5d3e with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qx2g6-000CTl-18; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 10:05:54 +0000 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:05:14 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: David Woodhouse , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , linux-kernel Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lockdep: add lockdep_cleanup_dead_cpu() Message-ID: <202310291748.ld6JE1m3-lkp@intel.com> References: <635fa006e8f3816b4a36b964d6281f0d8efa789b.camel@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <635fa006e8f3816b4a36b964d6281f0d8efa789b.camel@infradead.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on groat.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (groat.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Hi David, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/smp/core] [also build test WARNING on tip/locking/core linus/master v6.6-rc7 next-20231027] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Woodhouse/lockdep-add-lockdep_cleanup_dead_cpu/20231029-032722 base: tip/smp/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/635fa006e8f3816b4a36b964d6281f0d8efa789b.camel%40infradead.org patch subject: [PATCH v2] lockdep: add lockdep_cleanup_dead_cpu() config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231029/202310291748.ld6JE1m3-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231029/202310291748.ld6JE1m3-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310291748.ld6JE1m3-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from init/init_task.c:2: In file included from include/linux/init_task.h:5: In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:26: >> include/linux/irqflags.h:36:19: warning: declaration of 'struct task_struct' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 36 | struct task_struct *idle) {} | ^ In file included from init/init_task.c:2: In file included from include/linux/init_task.h:9: In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:10: In file included from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from init/init_task.c:2: In file included from include/linux/init_task.h:9: In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:10: In file included from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from init/init_task.c:2: In file included from include/linux/init_task.h:9: In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:10: In file included from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 13 warnings generated. -- In file included from arch/um/kernel/reboot.c:6: In file included from include/linux/sched/signal.h:5: In file included from include/linux/rculist.h:11: In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:26: >> include/linux/irqflags.h:36:19: warning: declaration of 'struct task_struct' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 36 | struct task_struct *idle) {} | ^ arch/um/kernel/reboot.c:45:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'machine_restart' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 45 | void machine_restart(char * __unused) | ^ arch/um/kernel/reboot.c:45:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 45 | void machine_restart(char * __unused) | ^ | static arch/um/kernel/reboot.c:51:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'machine_power_off' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 51 | void machine_power_off(void) | ^ arch/um/kernel/reboot.c:51:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 51 | void machine_power_off(void) | ^ | static arch/um/kernel/reboot.c:57:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'machine_halt' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 57 | void machine_halt(void) | ^ arch/um/kernel/reboot.c:57:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 57 | void machine_halt(void) | ^ | static 4 warnings generated. -- In file included from arch/um/kernel/early_printk.c:7: In file included from include/linux/console.h:19: In file included from include/linux/rculist.h:11: In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:26: >> include/linux/irqflags.h:36:19: warning: declaration of 'struct task_struct' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 36 | struct task_struct *idle) {} | ^ 1 warning generated. -- In file included from kernel/irq_work.c:12: In file included from include/linux/irq_work.h:6: In file included from include/linux/rcuwait.h:5: In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:26: >> include/linux/irqflags.h:36:19: warning: declaration of 'struct task_struct' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 36 | struct task_struct *idle) {} | ^ In file included from kernel/irq_work.c:14: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from kernel/irq_work.c:14: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from kernel/irq_work.c:14: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ kernel/irq_work.c:72:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_irq_work_raise' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 72 | void __weak arch_irq_work_raise(void) | ^ kernel/irq_work.c:72:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 72 | void __weak arch_irq_work_raise(void) | ^ | static 14 warnings generated. -- In file included from lib/maple_tree.c:54: In file included from include/linux/maple_tree.h:12: In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:26: >> include/linux/irqflags.h:36:19: warning: declaration of 'struct task_struct' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 36 | struct task_struct *idle) {} | ^ lib/maple_tree.c:331:21: warning: unused function 'mte_set_full' [-Wunused-function] 331 | static inline void *mte_set_full(const struct maple_enode *node) | ^ lib/maple_tree.c:336:21: warning: unused function 'mte_clear_full' [-Wunused-function] 336 | static inline void *mte_clear_full(const struct maple_enode *node) | ^ lib/maple_tree.c:341:20: warning: unused function 'mte_has_null' [-Wunused-function] 341 | static inline bool mte_has_null(const struct maple_enode *node) | ^ lib/maple_tree.c:672:29: warning: unused function 'mas_pivot' [-Wunused-function] 672 | static inline unsigned long mas_pivot(struct ma_state *mas, unsigned char piv) | ^ lib/maple_tree.c:4319:20: warning: stack frame size (1064) exceeds limit (1024) in 'mas_wr_modify' [-Wframe-larger-than] 4319 | static inline void mas_wr_modify(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) | ^ 6 warnings generated. vim +36 include/linux/irqflags.h 19 20 /* Currently lockdep_softirqs_on/off is used only by lockdep */ 21 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING 22 extern void lockdep_softirqs_on(unsigned long ip); 23 extern void lockdep_softirqs_off(unsigned long ip); 24 extern void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(void); 25 extern void lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip); 26 extern void lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsigned long ip); 27 extern void lockdep_cleanup_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu, 28 struct task_struct *idle); 29 #else 30 static inline void lockdep_softirqs_on(unsigned long ip) { } 31 static inline void lockdep_softirqs_off(unsigned long ip) { } 32 static inline void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(void) { } 33 static inline void lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip) { } 34 static inline void lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsigned long ip) { } 35 static inline void lockdep_cleanup_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu, > 36 struct task_struct *idle) {} 37 #endif 38 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki