Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35;
Date:   Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:35:49 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size
Message-ID: <6c10edf1-dad1-4a4f-ae0e-42b17febbd5d@lunn.ch>
References: <20231027-fix-rtl8366rb-v1-1-d565d905535a@linaro.org>
 <95f324af-88de-4692-966f-588287305e09@gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdbyMEqjW1a9oK-GM2_XL0famH1RgSXW-fQLszn9t9UhWw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbyMEqjW1a9oK-GM2_XL0famH1RgSXW-fQLszn9t9UhWw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

> The switch is pretty bogus, all documentation we have of it is a vendor
> code drop, no data sheet. The format for ingress and egress tags
> was discovered using trial-and-error.

The code drop does not include tagging? Does the code drop also pad to
full size Ethernet frames?

I still think it would be good to do some systematic testing to figure
out if there is any pattern to the drops.

     Andrew