Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231027130320.69469330@canb.auug.org.au> <CAHC9VhQ+Nt7CrLxSZcOVNEtAypruOmM0ST0P0JJMrOq4XYmAkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4b4eb40c-b65a-46e2-9e23-5412a9cdcad0@canonical.com> <CAHC9VhQbxJ4-z4Hp7CSmtcTNOWGFeQF2eEyct9=nHCMN_89YXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231031074649.3bdbec45@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20231031074649.3bdbec45@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:04:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhR=x7qB3gmQg+GPYLnXtGU88S3KCiZGjRYtDKSJHp4P1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the apparmor tree with the security tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 4:46=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org=
.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:52:50 -0400 Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote=
:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 5:09=E2=80=AFPM John Johansen <john.johansen@ca=
nonical.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > is part of the Three basic syscalls series, the plan is still to have=
 that
> > > series bake in next for a full cycle?
> >
> > Yes, that's still the plan.  Once v6.7-rc1 is out I'll rebase the LSM
> > syscall patches and I expect the vast majority of these conflicts to
> > disappear, although I'm sure we'll pick up some new ones with the rest
> > of the v6.7-rcX cycle :)
>
> These patches should not be in linux-next until after v6.7-rc1.

What if we wanted additional testing beyond the typical?  Do you not
support that?

--=20
paul-moore.com