Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756286AbXKWLCP (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:02:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753967AbXKWLB5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:01:57 -0500 Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:33574 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753770AbXKWLB4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:01:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:55:19 +0300 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Andrew Morton Cc: Simon Arlott , Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Matt Mackall Subject: Re: 2.6.23 WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:139 local_bh_enable() Message-ID: <20071123105518.GA22062@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <4745DCD7.8070805@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20071123002157.cb27f4a1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071123002157.cb27f4a1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1404 Lines: 29 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:21:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote: > > [2059664.615816] __iptables__: init4 IN=ppp0 OUT=ppp0 WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:139 local_bh_enable() > > [2059664.620535] [<80120364>] local_bh_enable+0x3c/0x97 > > [2059664.620657] [<8011c205>] __call_console_drivers+0x61/0x6d > > [2059664.620669] [<8011c3fc>] release_console_sem+0x164/0x1bf > > [2059664.620679] [<8011c81f>] vprintk+0x27a/0x2ff > If that trace is to be beieved we're doing nefilter stuff on packets which > were sent across netconsole. > > This probably isn't anything the netfilter guys have thought about. And > probably we don't want them to. Is there some simple way in which we can > exempt netconsole from netfilter processing? This is not about netfilter, but about freeing skb in interrupt context, which is not allowed, and in interrupt skbs are queued to be freed in softirq, but netcnsole wants to flush softirq freeing queue. That is a question: why? Removing zap_completion_queue() from find_skb() will fix the warning, but I'm not sure this is a correct fix. I've added Matt to the Cc list. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/