Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2023 18:04:12 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Esteban Blanc <eblanc@baylibre.com>, a.zummo@towertech.it,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
        jpanis@baylibre.com, jneanne@baylibre.com, u-kumar1@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] rtc: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 RTC
Message-ID: <202311021704127e77aa02@mail.local>
References: <20231102132616.1130960-1-eblanc@baylibre.com>
 <CAHp75VdvR0H7XVLWGqdZqSgoHprUUPQHGiyWEEaHjTgEbeinqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CWOGMAUT9MKY.2IBKELIOR1CF7@burritosblues>
 <CAHp75VdV5A+WpWj2eY9o_2wwPB7GTi6Eig7YyV8urdv1P3utgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <2023110216503718884fde@mail.local>
 <CAHp75VcfKdeQeJRhyANhnwB2j-AikzNY1t_vr5=Qon1tdR6P2Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcfKdeQeJRhyANhnwB2j-AikzNY1t_vr5=Qon1tdR6P2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 02/11/2023 19:00:27+0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 6:50 PM Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > On 02/11/2023 18:46:05+0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 6:17 PM Esteban Blanc <eblanc@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu Nov 2, 2023 at 5:00 PM CET, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 3:26 PM Esteban Blanc <eblanc@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Notes:
> > > > > >     This patch was picked from a series since there is no dependency between
> > > > > >     the two patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not sure if RTC maintainer uses the b4 tool, but as I said in previous
> > > > > email for pinctrl change, there is no need to resend. b4 has an
> > > > > ability to select patches from the series to be applied.
> > > >
> > > > Oh that's good to know, I was not aware of that.
> > > > I resent it because there was some minor nits that I fixed on both
> > > > patches.
> > >
> > > Ah, that was not reflected in the changelog...
> >
> > For the record, I'm using b4 but it was not clear which path the patches
> > would take.
> 
> You mean in the initial series? You take it by direct message-id with
> -P _. Or did I misunderstand the problem?

No I mean it was not clear whether I should take the patch or it would
get through MFD.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com