Received: by 2002:a05:7412:8521:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id t33csp2064369rdf; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 03:56:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4c5Kxhtl0Lntgp0hWVZDXfQ1yKFYkBxNktiTSwN9u//XJDrSyMxT9s6LhUb8jxa1Zi+mm X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:38c6:b0:280:1df1:cbc7 with SMTP id nn6-20020a17090b38c600b002801df1cbc7mr19074812pjb.19.1699271772861; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 03:56:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1699271772; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UixqKGk+YxulbMKxRidG9XZu38vJQ461f41AmvrhhO+K8BTBP1sPYLRUikul5YB+b9 ZXuT1888VlJC++eyXcjaT3pmbA3m4Wk/6imyCJiz8SLqB3PfK2W9u8k9+9RcJeVrrcHX lZBt42gWZ0Ki5lpgbuNanUrzzhFdF9pXCMlkjtPgSb5yY9EustN3RO27wnRlHE8dYs+O YJW7kKCPiMpm/xnaQpDob+cHIx9OCoWJKehI+milPI+/UrEjoAxYDuAULmdSUtv78hn3 lVYL6gcxqIR9Pxq6LO4Was1FFuiR4ydi3sFmIC6UD3yvMQR5aSEm1bWDMYDCV+Ak1mW+ EJYw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=gI3xCMXfcB+src4UwQsehw1949W0KFbwKLmzbP4s340=; fh=SRCoHmzcwnh4fOUPxV6ln2SqLdBASUk+kROegSfhjiM=; b=sFFVKv8zEboULr6ucpr5fj80LV1iGIQm6zvZrfwpfdgYwU/NFvgGyHfYieCVnqvOt1 t2TURu50/QnvD76mIMlVzVyFYeR8rYT+sMDR6Xox84O8DxI11EzTZrWZMrQZKiDs4sSG YiGz5f/1QJaeJTe2X4fcFVHOv8ULvImXQsDWlIgs+pr6IiMfFpbprrn/Ayy1Fp+QcCDo i4fuivNPO0JLLhFRgbJa6qx3BVyn4tflk//WfCsZnoBBQ1POAcJwkV0ZpWYA/tJk9f+v AVsK9tfLCtoLEZ3b6OPtvIsQbjB1j8Gzzmko9WMl9WybRbdDxHMC5awFYGWD2KnOsocK ND0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QzZeypk7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from agentk.vger.email (agentk.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s59-20020a17090a2f4100b0028016799242si8017807pjd.80.2023.11.06.03.56.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Nov 2023 03:56:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QzZeypk7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by agentk.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9EF80532CF; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 03:56:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at agentk.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231573AbjKFLzp (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Nov 2023 06:55:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51264 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231560AbjKFLzg (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2023 06:55:36 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE51F3 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 03:54:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1699271692; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gI3xCMXfcB+src4UwQsehw1949W0KFbwKLmzbP4s340=; b=QzZeypk72slLq9AAn7968YzqdEFMimys8jt2lAeLnNHkizQsRhX8P3hYCeeRJOyDiZ9Q4o eEDbeBxTkF/EowMAAg3WIjh+ssNrxmw6L/qjgqPHzaxjYRSUeqouZsPW2zFWSYc5I9HXmx V+dMaZrQJzzRSnJpVrHDzIe770ttIlY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-166-0TncSstmNjedbITciSgJZw-1; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 06:54:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 0TncSstmNjedbITciSgJZw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E122823810; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.120.12]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C0D440C6EB9; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 19:54:30 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Ed Tsai =?utf-8?B?KOiUoeWul+i7kik=?= Cc: Will Shiu =?utf-8?B?KOioseaBreeRnCk=?= , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Wang =?utf-8?B?KOeOi+S/oeWPiyk=?= , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Alice Chao =?utf-8?B?KOi2meePruWdhyk=?= , wsd_upstream , "axboe@kernel.dk" , Casper Li =?utf-8?B?KOadjuS4reamrik=?= , Chun-Hung Wu =?utf-8?B?KOW3q+mnv+Wujyk=?= , Powen Kao =?utf-8?B?KOmrmOS8r+aWhyk=?= , Naomi Chu =?utf-8?B?KOacseipoOeUsCk=?= , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Stanley Chu =?utf-8?B?KOacseWOn+mZnik=?= , "matthias.bgg@gmail.com" , "angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com" , ming.lei@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: Check the queue limit before bio submitting Message-ID: References: <20231025092255.27930-1-ed.tsai@mediatek.com> <64db8f5406571c2f89b70f852eb411320201abe6.camel@mediatek.com> <2bc847a83849973b7658145f2efdda86cc47e3d5.camel@mediatek.com> <5ecedad658bf28abf9bbeeb70dcac09b4b404cf5.camel@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on agentk.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (agentk.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 06 Nov 2023 03:56:00 -0800 (PST) On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:53:31PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 01:40:12AM +0000, Ed Tsai (蔡宗軒) wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 09:33 +0800, Ed Tsai wrote: > > > On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 11:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > ... > > > Sorry for missing out on my dd command. Here it is: > > dd if=/data/test_file of=/dev/null bs=64m count=1 iflag=direct > > OK, thanks for the sharing. > > I understand the issue now, but not sure if it is one good idea to check > queue limit in __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(): > > 1) bio->bi_bdev may not be set > > 2) what matters is actually bio's alignment, and bio size still can > be big enough > > So I cooked one patch, and it should address your issue: The following one fixes several bugs, and is verified to be capable of making big & aligned bios, feel free to run your test against this one: block/bio.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c index 816d412c06e9..80b36ce57510 100644 --- a/block/bio.c +++ b/block/bio.c @@ -1211,6 +1211,7 @@ static int bio_iov_add_zone_append_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, } #define PAGE_PTRS_PER_BVEC (sizeof(struct bio_vec) / sizeof(struct page *)) +#define BIO_CHUNK_SIZE (256U << 10) /** * __bio_iov_iter_get_pages - pin user or kernel pages and add them to a bio @@ -1266,6 +1267,31 @@ static int __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter) size -= trim; } + /* + * Try to make bio aligned with 128KB if it isn't the last one, so + * we can avoid small bio in case of big chunk sequential IO because + * of bio split and multipage bvec. + * + * If nothing is added to this bio, simply allow unaligned since we + * have chance to add more bytes + */ + if (iov_iter_count(iter) && bio->bi_iter.bi_size) { + unsigned int aligned_size = (bio->bi_iter.bi_size + size) & + ~(BIO_CHUNK_SIZE - 1); + + if (aligned_size <= bio->bi_iter.bi_size) { + /* stop to add page if this bio can't keep aligned */ + if (!(bio->bi_iter.bi_size & (BIO_CHUNK_SIZE - 1))) { + ret = left = size; + goto revert; + } + } else { + aligned_size -= bio->bi_iter.bi_size; + iov_iter_revert(iter, size - aligned_size); + size = aligned_size; + } + } + if (unlikely(!size)) { ret = -EFAULT; goto out; @@ -1285,7 +1311,7 @@ static int __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter) offset = 0; } - +revert: iov_iter_revert(iter, left); out: while (i < nr_pages) -- 2.41.0 Thanks, Ming