Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231103104900.409470-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> <CAJZ5v0iOY3u_jBmf=_3AnqEWHb+eTA6DtTfoU3tb=0RB0O+szw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFULd4YPVcWL6_bo2T4O=a6ed9hTOakp2m1_XBF3w-uWhyd4dQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4YPVcWL6_bo2T4O=a6ed9hTOakp2m1_XBF3w-uWhyd4dQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2023 16:09:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gFTdVH7Kr3cHcb+stGx_E-rm=B5h+z4ZFqfY=M9=Jffw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: Use %rip-relative addressing in wakeup_64.S
To:     Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:14 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 11:49 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Instruction with %rip-relative address operand is one byte shorter than
> > > its absolute address counterpart and is also compatible with position
> > > independent executable (-fpie) build.
> > >
> > > No functional changes intended.
> >
> > I'm wondering what's the exact motivation for making this change.
>
> Mainly to be consistent with what the compiler emits by default when a
> symbol is accessed. As said in the commit message, the %rip-relative
> access is also one byte shorter, and results in a position independent
> code.
>
> > Any urgent need for it doesn't seem to be there.
>
> True. It's mostly a nice-to-have change.

OK, so

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>

and the decision what to do with it is up to the x86 folks.

> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
> > > index d5d8a352eafa..94ff83f3d3fe 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
> > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> > >          * Hooray, we are in Long 64-bit mode (but still running in low memory)
> > >          */
> > >  SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64)
> > > -       movq    saved_magic, %rax
> > > +       movq    saved_magic(%rip), %rax
> > >         movq    $0x123456789abcdef0, %rdx
> > >         cmpq    %rdx, %rax
> > >         je      2f
> > > @@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64)
> > >         movw    %ax, %es
> > >         movw    %ax, %fs
> > >         movw    %ax, %gs
> > > -       movq    saved_rsp, %rsp
> > > +       movq    saved_rsp(%rip), %rsp
> > >
> > > -       movq    saved_rbx, %rbx
> > > -       movq    saved_rdi, %rdi
> > > -       movq    saved_rsi, %rsi
> > > -       movq    saved_rbp, %rbp
> > > +       movq    saved_rbx(%rip), %rbx
> > > +       movq    saved_rdi(%rip), %rdi
> > > +       movq    saved_rsi(%rip), %rsi
> > > +       movq    saved_rbp(%rip), %rbp
> > >
> > > -       movq    saved_rip, %rax
> > > +       movq    saved_rip(%rip), %rax
> > >         ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
> > >         jmp     *%rax
> > >  SYM_FUNC_END(wakeup_long64)
> > > @@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel)
> > >
> > >         movq    $.Lresume_point, saved_rip(%rip)
> > >
> > > -       movq    %rsp, saved_rsp
> > > -       movq    %rbp, saved_rbp
> > > -       movq    %rbx, saved_rbx
> > > -       movq    %rdi, saved_rdi
> > > -       movq    %rsi, saved_rsi
> > > +       movq    %rsp, saved_rsp(%rip)
> > > +       movq    %rbp, saved_rbp(%rip)
> > > +       movq    %rbx, saved_rbx(%rip)
> > > +       movq    %rdi, saved_rdi(%rip)
> > > +       movq    %rsi, saved_rsi(%rip)
> > >
> > >         addq    $8, %rsp
> > >         movl    $3, %edi
> > > --