Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:41:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:41:33 -0500 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:53769 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:41:19 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexander Viro Subject: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 14:41:02 +1100 Message-ID: <2452.1009338062@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Index: 2-pre1.1/fs/Config.in --- 2-pre1.1/fs/Config.in Sat, 24 Nov 2001 05:28:08 +1100 kaos (linux-2.5/F/d/27_Config.in 1.1 644) +++ 2-pre2.1/fs/Config.in Wed, 26 Dec 2001 14:32:39 +1100 kaos (linux-2.5/F/d/27_Config.in 1.2 644) @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ if [ "$CONFIG_JFFS2_FS" = "y" -o "$CONFI fi tristate 'Compressed ROM file system support' CONFIG_CRAMFS bool 'Virtual memory file system support (former shm fs)' CONFIG_TMPFS -tristate 'Simple RAM-based file system support' CONFIG_RAMFS +define_bool CONFIG_RAMFS y Why is ramfs forced on? And why is Al Viro's email address not in CREDITS or MAINTAINERS? We should have somewhere to complain to ;). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/