Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:51:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:51:44 -0500 Received: from f259.law9.hotmail.com ([64.4.8.134]:11270 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:51:33 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [66.92.149.187] From: "William Knop" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: LKML signal to noise ratio-- improvement Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:51:27 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2001 03:51:27.0505 (UTC) FILETIME=[98831810:01C18DC0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org M. Edward Borasky wrote: >I rather like the way the R project does it. They have three lists: >one for developers, one for "announcements" and one for help. The >announcements list is probably irrelevant; the announcements show up >on the other two lists. Ah yes, I meant to include -announcements too, but I forgot by the time I got down to the named parts. Perhaps a -proposals would be good too, so something like -misc posts would truly not fit into a preconcieved catagory. If people still announce to the other lists, they can be scolded. Although, it seems that with so many lists it gets too complex and parts of the system might be ignored; perhaps you are right, that three lists would suffice. But either way, one list with 7000+ messages a month is, as many have admitted, not optimal for developers and maintainers. Thanks, Will _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/