Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:02:46 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Use _set_opp_level() for single genpd case
Message-ID: <20231115053246.i5x4bdgtrjvoui2e@vireshk-i7>
References: <f709e9e273004be43efe3a2854a7e7b51a777f99.1697710527.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <CAPDyKFqbnsdT0nqKwQhai875CwwpW_vepr816fL+i8yLh=YQhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231025065458.z3klmhahrcqh6qyw@vireshk-i7>
 <CAPDyKFr4vdsKVYEx0aF5k_a1bTjp3NzMpNgaXDJOJrvujT7iRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZTkciw5AwufxQYnB@gerhold.net>
 <CAPDyKFq+zsoeF-4h5TfT4Z+S46a501_pUq8y2c1x==Tt6EKBGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231030102944.nrw4bta467zxes5c@vireshk-i7>
 <CAPDyKFrn97POKuNc3cMM9TOaw-f-ufLwYtUY8_L2w8+hzECWOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231106070830.7sd3ux3nvywpb54z@vireshk-i7>
 <CAPDyKFpgPdMLR12ajYFasCjm-Y-ZyVVtQz3j1CZVWfN9T3Gg0w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpgPdMLR12ajYFasCjm-Y-ZyVVtQz3j1CZVWfN9T3Gg0w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 10-11-23, 14:50, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> If this is only for required-opps and devices being hooked up to a PM
> domain (genpd), my suggestion would be to keep avoiding doing the
> propagation to required-opps-parents. For the similar reasons to why
> we don't do it for clock/regulators, the propagation and aggregation,
> seems to me, to belong better in genpd.
> 
> Did that make sense?

Hmm, it does. Let me see what I can do on this..

-- 
viresh