Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b101:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id az1csp2385260rdb; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:44:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEhCPDiGwgaNFhGwpiQ2TanAiGXc7y01Mi5HtvYRd/Wkptu9UlyMjgHT8FK6xhEa5QTlDyT X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:9183:b0:137:23f1:4281 with SMTP id v3-20020a056a20918300b0013723f14281mr10839102pzd.12.1700027077963; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:44:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700027077; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TIniWBQ4xmnbP3yk9xSYm/UdApKTXGWpBynQ7v60tt2zodkOn8nqVJHfoxtbY83HJk HgmqJLJwX21ImtZhnXd9WuWr0E9/e4UxqL4PLitUGydUM7Ac8NSZHAhbP5eIdRks8wyl M4NFT6nRpQcZNjnCSR3LLHHyrvY9CsmMYehpdfZ8fFq5EmBRxg6JhiatWPcaJHv0q3OY HeRAiClRosEV2ELspKD6lBZgnNzsEBZRuw5f+D6QYn9pEaA/HlJkvO4Pd8T5L/OEQXcp Mr2agqaeHmFZ76iKzplUVIASj2wR6qH0lFlwD4IESKLBxIZXgVqZ7nD63Zlk3tzqJJHD by1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=bY4Z/Qk6b8Cn+RiMGMmNPHOGMuf+mR68OgeZURN2hvc=; fh=pE2uB+Pj5ycJqeAHmrQX21zOyGN5AMkM6doeLbKSOMs=; b=bcb8Tl8fmEC6EkaY2csuWYHQHxqHBU7oDe6ULFcXrV8mye3kxBJOLUVTXpove2hR78 EBZoPvkWBUxQCKIVeESHq4d2WB5vqLLsfRpBtIoYfxUnkBL9uFF6VlSQaWqvNs0BIm86 lwszx7mPyC62PiTC9UhsrsVywymBRiGicgXPASXo2qWM7rHbm73+xYbG3ZPErZoUGGXr +dNMR2JgGWrMQSPPPv4WW5WcnRcHzGPrhPkibf/bLjCH981V70YRBKX4kNt+OwsqjUzb V5mba6+kiF0plesMbWqs+FdHG05KvmD2YQhX/VC0LPSXfJo/h8KYqHTtGKVUvJC1Ehsq fMpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from agentk.vger.email (agentk.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4-20020a655644000000b005ac2af99d30si9605060pgs.705.2023.11.14.21.44.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:44:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by agentk.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D6080C47BC; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:44:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at agentk.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234497AbjKOFo3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:44:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37160 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229600AbjKOFo2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:44:28 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C04FD1; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:44:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AF1DA7; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:45:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.163.37.87] (unknown [10.163.37.87]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A60603F6C4; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:44:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5bf73672-4094-490b-b0a9-b983d512c904@arm.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:14:12 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [V14 3/8] drivers: perf: arm_pmuv3: Enable branch stack sampling framework Content-Language: en-US To: James Clark Cc: Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Suzuki Poulose , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com References: <20231114051329.327572-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20231114051329.327572-4-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <0020aa0d-e9a5-aef6-f33d-817da56411a3@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual In-Reply-To: <0020aa0d-e9a5-aef6-f33d-817da56411a3@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on agentk.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (agentk.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:44:35 -0800 (PST) On 11/14/23 15:28, James Clark wrote: > > > On 14/11/2023 05:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Branch stack sampling support i.e capturing branch records during execution >> in core perf, rides along with normal HW events being scheduled on the PMU. >> This prepares ARMV8 PMU framework for branch stack support on relevant PMUs >> with required HW implementation. >> > > [...] > >> - All armv8pmu_branch_xxxx() stub definitions have been moved inside >> include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h for easy access from both arm32 and >> arm64 platforms >> > > This causes lots of W=1 build errors because the prototypes are in > arm_pmuv3.h, but arm_brbe.c doesn't include it. I guess these are the W=1 warnings you mentioned above. drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:11:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_reset’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 11 | void armv8pmu_branch_reset(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:190:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_save’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 190 | void armv8pmu_branch_save(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu, void *ctx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:236:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 236 | bool armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid(struct perf_event *event) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:269:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 269 | int armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:279:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_free’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 279 | void armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_free(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:303:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_probe’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 303 | void armv8pmu_branch_probe(struct arm_pmu *armpmu) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:449:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_enable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 449 | void armv8pmu_branch_enable(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:474:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_disable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 474 | void armv8pmu_branch_disable(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:717:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_read’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 717 | void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) Branch helpers are used in ARM PMU V3 driver i.e drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c. Whether the actual BRBE helper definitions, or their fallback stubs (when CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE is not enabled), need to be accessible from arm_pmuv3.c driver not from brbe.c implementations itself. > > It seems like the main reason you can't include arm_brbe.h in arm32 code > is because there are a load of inline functions and references to > registers in there. But these are only used in arm_brbe.c, so they don't Right, arm32 should not be exposed to BRBE internals via arm_brbe.h header. > need to be in the header anyway. Right, these are only used in arm_brbe.c > > If you removed the code from the header and moved it to the source file > you could move the brbe prototypes to the brbe header and it would be a > bit cleaner and more idiomatic. Alight, how about the following changes - build tested on arm32 and arm64. - Move BRBE helpers from arm_brbe.h into arm_brbe.c - Move armv8_pmu_xxx() declaration inside arm_brbe.h for arm64 (CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE) - Move armv8_pmu_xxx() stub definitions inside arm_pmuv3.c for arm32 (!CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE) - Include arm_brbe.h header both in arm_pmuv3.c and arm_brbe.c