Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:26:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:26:29 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:51925 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:26:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:26:18 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Keith Owens cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on In-Reply-To: <2452.1009338062@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > Index: 2-pre1.1/fs/Config.in > --- 2-pre1.1/fs/Config.in Sat, 24 Nov 2001 05:28:08 +1100 kaos (linux-2.5/F/d/27_Config.in 1.1 644) > +++ 2-pre2.1/fs/Config.in Wed, 26 Dec 2001 14:32:39 +1100 kaos (linux-2.5/F/d/27_Config.in 1.2 644) > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ if [ "$CONFIG_JFFS2_FS" = "y" -o "$CONFI > fi > tristate 'Compressed ROM file system support' CONFIG_CRAMFS > bool 'Virtual memory file system support (former shm fs)' CONFIG_TMPFS > -tristate 'Simple RAM-based file system support' CONFIG_RAMFS > +define_bool CONFIG_RAMFS y > > Why is ramfs forced on? Because it's always used for rootfs - notice a bunch of crap disappearing from the end of fs/namespace.c. In principle, we can keep the config item and make the first DECLARE_FSTYPE in ramfs/inode.c conditional, but that will only make ramfs invisible - code still needs to be compiled in. > And why is Al Viro's email address not in CREDITS or MAINTAINERS? We > should have somewhere to complain to ;). I _do_ read l-k. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/