Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b101:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id az1csp2478404rdb; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:43:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFeVk5nzEY6sFMwdC+2j7Olf5LNJA0NRLfHr0ISjfjIsKbk996iZ5lkqCZWFVFDw7Wq3KdR X-Received: by 2002:a54:4015:0:b0:3ae:5c48:6f41 with SMTP id x21-20020a544015000000b003ae5c486f41mr14344977oie.28.1700041400478; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:43:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700041400; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N4ey7GTqpaUznHRFVxDRaqbDcj3n6dp1mzPy8rxHIFPl2ZUpfEifUJ58EjLH39GC0S 5S13TkPts9lYFgkkWJieGXP4dYdfCGviFnDZVnaDouQYyvULRWHKyP7/JagtwTUaieYU IXd4972MRhIRkArIHgznuBa3N+fbe8rf3ynt2H98/+elPfS4nyrDmCcPQOGv+7k4PVyp Z4WBunRLGyYUtv6BfxkteJCJm4/NBgvgn/D8aIicv4M2gTU6fk68jWnAfWSRr/lRyMaM cgGnUFk3YdEzZma9fZaxL4fMzBocnrYot3Kemng6o1rNVquSB2w7T5pF4TEnxdF0JRVX cRxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=uPEBowwKsUd9JOZeAZvmhh8L3Gp4QBVJhnhV4y1DyOs=; fh=+4m20OdoPfZdQnucF0bMtXq+yoRX6QE7Hjkkwpp0yUw=; b=S+sXb2KgmqAHdzutQCR3nvQPGk1khqVOdyBXPQMUIZQM0udh/mFu8L7inkj86W307P jjOruqunHg8KFACakEQBQFBSMidECMtvr01u+m1AWtDRhaYyo3jmwkBNTig4A3r5oLpT BJqaYMWJETpcAy94n18HTRdStkXUQOnnomO5p9EFjiE/CEbLccCEDxzDZuGreczn8GyW u5ifcWDIKKyQ+hJRx0KLcNhjsvneT8+6Dao0P4naLRivI8HkOktOuh44LnxV3gP0aGhA Y90seTJys7JeN//BVWJ2OUhLUfMFmPINN0ldqG5KDerb3t9CuuM8DFew2jzyObafr2r2 vqcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from lipwig.vger.email (lipwig.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c8-20020a63ea08000000b005b930e0b600si9520183pgi.820.2023.11.15.01.43.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:43:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by lipwig.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF51B802891F; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:43:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at lipwig.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234822AbjKOJnK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 04:43:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234688AbjKOJnJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 04:43:09 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F99D8; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:43:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28E9DA7; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from e129154.nice.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 974BA3F7B4; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:42:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 10:42:08 +0100 From: Beata Michalska To: Vincent Guittot Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, lftan@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] arm64/amu: Use capacity_ref_freq to set AMU ratio Message-ID: References: <20231109101438.1139696-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20231109101438.1139696-8-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lipwig.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (lipwig.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:43:17 -0800 (PST) On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:07:01PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:14:38AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > Use the new capacity_ref_freq to set the ratio that is used by AMU for > > computing the arch_scale_freq_capacity(). > > This helps to keep everything aligned using the same reference for > > computing CPUs capacity. > > > > The default value of the ratio (stored in per_cpu(arch_max_freq_scale)) > > ensures that arch_scale_freq_capacity() returns max capacity until it is > > set to its correct value with the cpu capacity and capacity_ref_freq. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 +++++++++++- > > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > > index 817d788cd866..1a2c72f3e7f8 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > > @@ -82,7 +82,12 @@ int __init parse_acpi_topology(void) > > #undef pr_fmt > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "AMU: " fmt > > > > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, arch_max_freq_scale); > > +/* > > + * Ensure that amu_scale_freq_tick() will return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE until > > + * the CPU capacity and its associated frequency have been correctly > > + * initialized. > > + */ > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, arch_max_freq_scale) = 1UL << (2 * SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT); > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arch_const_cycles_prev); > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arch_core_cycles_prev); > > static cpumask_var_t amu_fie_cpus; > > @@ -112,14 +117,14 @@ static inline bool freq_counters_valid(int cpu) > > return true; > > } > > > > -static int freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate, u64 ref_rate) > > +void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate) > > { > > - u64 ratio; > > + u64 ratio, ref_rate = arch_timer_get_rate(); > > > > if (unlikely(!max_rate || !ref_rate)) { > > - pr_debug("CPU%d: invalid maximum or reference frequency.\n", > > + WARN_ONCE(1, "CPU%d: invalid maximum or reference frequency.\n", > > cpu); > > - return -EINVAL; > > + return; > > } > > > > /* > > @@ -139,12 +144,10 @@ static int freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate, u64 ref_rate) > > ratio = div64_u64(ratio, max_rate); > > if (!ratio) { > > WARN_ONCE(1, "Reference frequency too low.\n"); > > - return -EINVAL; > > + return; > > } > > > > - per_cpu(arch_max_freq_scale, cpu) = (unsigned long)ratio; > > - > > - return 0; > > + WRITE_ONCE(per_cpu(arch_max_freq_scale, cpu), (unsigned long)ratio); > > } > > > > static void amu_scale_freq_tick(void) > > @@ -195,10 +198,7 @@ static void amu_fie_setup(const struct cpumask *cpus) > > return; > > > > for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) { > > - if (!freq_counters_valid(cpu) || > > - freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > - cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(cpu) * 1000ULL, > > - arch_timer_get_rate())) > > + if (!freq_counters_valid(cpu)) > > > return; > > } > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c > > index 0a2e43728286..0906114963ff 100644 > > --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c > > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c > > @@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ bool __init topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu) > > return !ret; > > } > > > > +void __weak freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate) > > +{ > > +} > > + > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB > > #include > > > > @@ -381,6 +385,9 @@ void topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc(void) > > } > > > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > + per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > + > > capacity = raw_capacity[cpu]; > > capacity = div64_u64(capacity << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, > > capacity_scale); > > @@ -422,8 +429,11 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > > cpumask_andnot(cpus_to_visit, cpus_to_visit, policy->related_cpus); > > > > - for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) > > + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { > > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > + per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > + } > Just wondering if this is really necessary as freq_inv_set_max_ratio will > originally be called upon cpufreq notification being triggered (with > CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY event) which should happen after the newly introduced > capacity_freq_ref gets properly set up, so wouldn't the change of flipping > cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(cpu) to capacity_freq_ref do just fine ? > Then pushing AMU specific call to generic arch code would not be necessary. > Or did I miss smth on the way ? > I guess you can ignore my comment as init_cpu_capacity_callback (where we now set the capacity_freq_ref) works on the same basis so there is no guarantee it will be triggered before AMU callback. Still having the freq_inv_set_max_ratio sitting in arch_topology.c somehow doesn't sit well with me. We could potentially check capacity_freq_ref against its init value and act accordingly but that is gruesome as well. > --- > BR > B. > > > > > if (cpumask_empty(cpus_to_visit)) { > > topology_normalize_cpu_scale(); > > diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > index 32c24ff4f2a8..a63d61ca55af 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpu); > > void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid); > > void reset_cpu_topology(void); > > int parse_acpi_topology(void); > > +void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate); > > #endif > > > > #endif /* _LINUX_ARCH_TOPOLOGY_H_ */ > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >