Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:48:20 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] i2c: designware: Fix PM calls order in
 dw_i2c_plat_probe()
Message-ID: <ZVTMJA5JsQI13dhz@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231110182304.3894319-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20231110182304.3894319-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <e299ee44-7de1-4542-828d-a0c86b217fb4@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e299ee44-7de1-4542-828d-a0c86b217fb4@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 01:14:36PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 11/10/23 20:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > We should not mix managed calls with non-managed. This will break
> > the calls order at the error path and ->remove() stages. Fix this
> > by wrapping PM ops to become managed one.
> > 
> > Fixes: 36d48fb5766a ("i2c: designware-platdrv: enable RuntimePM before registering to the core")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> I fail to see what was broken in above commit and how this patch fixes it?

The order of the unwiding probed flow is broken now as devm_*() mixed with
non-devm_*() calls. This makes all non-devm_*() calls that interleave devm_*()
ones to be also devm_*()-wrapped.

...

> Is it intended change the reset isn't asserted after this patch in case
> i2c_dw_probe() fails?

Did you miss that this is become managed with this patch and hence the above
is false scenario?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko