Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b101:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id az1csp2605421rdb; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 05:51:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlCYih8JGcINtAin4wWKJ09/qUgkLEo5B711fAuHXj7VmSgg3AChJM98ZBaaoxeQ637J0b X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:228e:b0:1ca:505:8c86 with SMTP id b14-20020a170903228e00b001ca05058c86mr6624079plh.20.1700056307437; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 05:51:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700056307; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b526TaEngPiSLEvkEoCWhS9aKMMBD/JbNOBSa+4jPtG1xqEkn6avvWtkWvTqWP6QYV IFA3RY9B/uIJTyDZEVTIYCOGW5QrSfwuNqiCxxXipPP1UfVVNKI9uSOI4ZAycE5Tgibw dLCQ+PEFiWm/6GZTC1Tu9BaslLM6b8/45HcxxIFHr6O5LeYS42xq0e02tck9fNyNKPQ6 TY4tvxw1+8eN1O+QcZ72tUxYflURRGXyFu5dOBJqfcRXm4Mtb9aHHsQUKgrTktxnMGL1 OBuVeA/1V1Xk/m5L2QXdrjpS2BfvX8i+asEiY2F7E6iCqTgzQafI1mysd8roWc+LCMA2 XQpw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:organization:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=iTKJN8A4Bm367hKkKHSVO3jAErqSqdx2Nz5znNFH5pI=; fh=Va4dVzracqKiUni5mUtfmwugNK/c609MVUKg4dal2KU=; b=ya0F80jg/vXgkX3xJD+qoxpiqHF0cZe0PGxaMDmtlB6Iy3IxQ9Jliab2ulmGe2jAPn orpd3oi96N9T8bpWkG9nYeQ+ZcFzi/SWOpf5TUcllEqrXqkMfss+ejjSRSS/6QUBBB92 rpi5qR0456veczuO0q87kwZ4DYvOWHnlm+Fql6+YGkl/eMa5iT7M7OIoblsMtit5X2pe s/hkd+KKz7DAQ0D7X682k2jRO6NzZlQwsiMDD8fsyVyxGne5nS+mfI4zAGhRa1hf4Ce8 h5Qcba7RnzjrC1H5fYQNzbF+1oF4X0w+s3CSVRlJGAa06GzZiMnL2Y/r5KZ4Cl56pT2I SbCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=E0w5aFJn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from agentk.vger.email (agentk.vger.email. [23.128.96.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3-20020a170902d2c300b001cc453f5178si10594011plc.439.2023.11.15.05.51.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 05:51:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=E0w5aFJn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by agentk.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3ECF8027F6A; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 05:51:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at agentk.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344025AbjKONvf (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:51:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45942 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343868AbjKONvd (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:51:33 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F6FC8; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 05:51:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700056289; x=1731592289; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=of9AMIKCSH75RHDLANVQfD/mECbR5A8WG8K4l8+mfqY=; b=E0w5aFJnq4s4zjmrN7Dj269fr+fMtZTP80SpgSmE1uSURiL5iBLUonW0 upBXgKYDYTE0Ux/KxEuP2EuRzYG7C/DoFYslChjT1fqmLy70i06lIjFwU X5CXY4reA7VWPt1brzEFw4sRvhx3GgkrF8/UDTPDvtXgu8lVVluZ3LwlF jXgyUCFpJ2gONXmJYQJB6h5dne0Pmz7th3xlcyCG8e+ECKJrDTc4tsobQ y9egKUGsNVMM5EQqvo17ICwQYSC0lyP6vZE4TRHb5Cqy4HeH2K6ZtJlWV MVf/jifc6oEpyzbMfE407JnDDi7RkQ8aYol6BHPOcJyRBk+gfbmqHYXzo w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10894"; a="375917076" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,305,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="375917076" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Nov 2023 05:51:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10894"; a="882397802" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,305,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="882397802" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Nov 2023 05:51:25 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1r3GIc-0000000EKQa-0jnW; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:51:22 +0200 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:51:21 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: Mario Limonciello , Herbert Xu , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti , Philipp Zabel , Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] i2c: designware: Fix PM calls order in dw_i2c_plat_probe() Message-ID: References: <20231110182304.3894319-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20231110182304.3894319-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on agentk.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (agentk.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 05:51:42 -0800 (PST) On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:48:20PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 01:14:36PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > On 11/10/23 20:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > Is it intended change the reset isn't asserted after this patch in case > > i2c_dw_probe() fails? > > Did you miss that this is become managed with this patch and hence the above > is false scenario? Ah, I see now what you mean. Sorry, I though about next patch in mind. Indeed, I need to amend this one. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko