Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38;
Message-ID: <23cebdf8-1a51-481e-a8c2-e17021099e05@bytedance.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:48:04 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Yiwei Lin <s921975628@gmail.com>
Cc:     Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
        Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
        Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@chromium.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
References: <20231107090510.71322-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
 <20231107090510.71322-2-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
 <da42f1d7-adfe-485e-987e-3e8dae78b4c2@gmail.com>
From:   Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
In-Reply-To: <da42f1d7-adfe-485e-987e-3e8dae78b4c2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/15/23 11:36 PM, Yiwei Lin Wrote:
> 
>> @@ -3712,8 +3811,17 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
>>       enqueue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
>>       if (se->on_rq) {
>>           update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
>> -        if (cfs_rq->curr != se)
>> -            avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se);
>> +        if (!curr) {
>> +            /*
>> +             * The entity's vruntime has been adjusted, so let's check
>> +             * whether the rq-wide min_vruntime needs updated too. Since
>> +             * the calculations above require stable min_vruntime rather
>> +             * than up-to-date one, we do the update at the end of the
>> +             * reweight process.
>> +             */
>> +            __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
>> +            update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
>> +        }
>>       }
>>   }
> Sorry if I am asking stupid question...... It looks like reweight_entity() may have chance to change the weight of cfs_rq->curr entity, but we'll never update_min_vruntime() when reweighting it. Is there any reason that we can skip the update_min_vruntime() for this case?

No, you are right!

Thanks!
	Abel