Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231113112344.719-1-hkallweit1@gmail.com> <ZVJhwSS16+/Zzt0f@shikoro>
 <887657ba-86ca-49bc-b6c3-8543610c3230@gmail.com> <ZVKNIn1eSlZ9yzco@shikoro>
In-Reply-To: <ZVKNIn1eSlZ9yzco@shikoro>
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 14:17:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CADnq5_NgzZ+1FTzZObivnjJbbuYcafY-fbvgiGA9ryqA9wYedg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>,
        linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:55=E2=80=AFPM Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote=
:
>
>
> > We're not in a hurry. It's just my experience with patch series' affect=
ing
> > multiple subsystems that typically the decision was to apply the full
> > series via one tree. Also to avoid inquires from maintainers like:
> > Shall I take it or are you going to take it?
> > Of course there may be different opinions. Please advise.
>
> Ok, then this turns out to be a negotation thing between the drm/fbdev
> maintainers and me. I *can* take all the patches, of course. But since
> the number of patches touching the non-i2c subsystems is high, I'd like
> to hear their preference, too.
>

I don't have a preference if you would prefer to take these via i2c.

Alex