Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35;
Message-ID: <c2552b30-92ee-435b-a50c-9c34c25bc421@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:37:25 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] coresight: Pass guest TRFCR value to KVM
Content-Language: en-GB
To:     James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        maz@kernel.org
Cc:     broonie@kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
        Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
        Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20231019165510.1966367-1-james.clark@arm.com>
 <20231019165510.1966367-7-james.clark@arm.com>
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231019165510.1966367-7-james.clark@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 19/10/2023 17:55, James Clark wrote:
> Currently the userspace and kernel filters for guests are never set, so
> no trace will be generated for them. Add support for tracing guests by
> passing the desired TRFCR value to KVM so it can be applied to the
> guest.
> 
> By writing either E1TRE or E0TRE, filtering on either guest kernel or
> guest userspace is also supported. And if both E1TRE and E0TRE are
> cleared when exclude_guest is set, that option is supported too. This
> change also brings exclude_host support which is difficult to add as a
> separate commit without excess churn and resulting in no trace at all.
> 
> Testing
> =======
> 
> The addresses were counted with the following:
> 
>    $ perf report -D | grep -Eo 'EL2|EL1|EL0' | sort | uniq -c
> 
> Guest kernel only:
> 
>    $ perf record -e cs_etm//Gk -a -- true
>      535 EL1
>        1 EL2
> 
> Guest user only (only 5 addresses because the guest runs slowly in the
> model):
> 
>    $ perf record -e cs_etm//Gu -a -- true
>      5 EL0
> 
> Host kernel only:
> 
>    $  perf record -e cs_etm//Hk -a -- true
>     3501 EL2
> 
> Host userspace only:
> 
>    $  perf record -e cs_etm//Hu -a -- true
>      408 EL0
>        1 EL2
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> ---
>   .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c          | 42 ++++++++++++++++---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h |  2 +-
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h  |  3 ++
>   3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> index 77b0271ce6eb..292f9da6aeaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>   #include <linux/bitops.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>   #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>   #include <linux/init.h>
>   #include <linux/types.h>
> @@ -271,9 +272,22 @@ static void etm4x_prohibit_trace(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>   	/* If the CPU doesn't support FEAT_TRF, nothing to do */
>   	if (!drvdata->trfcr)
>   		return;
> +	kvm_etm_set_guest_trfcr(0);
>   	cpu_prohibit_trace();
>   }
>   
> +static u64 etm4x_get_kern_user_filter(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> +{
> +	u64 trfcr = drvdata->trfcr;
> +
> +	if (drvdata->config.mode & ETM_MODE_EXCL_KERN)
> +		trfcr &= ~TRFCR_ELx_ExTRE;
> +	if (drvdata->config.mode & ETM_MODE_EXCL_USER)
> +		trfcr &= ~TRFCR_ELx_E0TRE;
> +
> +	return trfcr;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * etm4x_allow_trace - Allow CPU tracing in the respective ELs,
>    * as configured by the drvdata->config.mode for the current
> @@ -286,18 +300,28 @@ static void etm4x_prohibit_trace(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>    */
>   static void etm4x_allow_trace(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {
> -	u64 trfcr = drvdata->trfcr;
> +	u64 trfcr;
>   
>   	/* If the CPU doesn't support FEAT_TRF, nothing to do */
> -	if (!trfcr)
> +	if (!drvdata->trfcr)
>   		return;
>   
> -	if (drvdata->config.mode & ETM_MODE_EXCL_KERN)
> -		trfcr &= ~TRFCR_ELx_ExTRE;
> -	if (drvdata->config.mode & ETM_MODE_EXCL_USER)
> -		trfcr &= ~TRFCR_ELx_E0TRE;
> +	if (drvdata->config.mode & ETM_MODE_EXCL_HOST)
> +		trfcr = drvdata->trfcr & ~(TRFCR_ELx_ExTRE | TRFCR_ELx_E0TRE);
> +	else
> +		trfcr = etm4x_get_kern_user_filter(drvdata);
>   
>   	write_trfcr(trfcr);
> +
> +	/* Set filters for guests and pass to KVM */
> +	if (drvdata->config.mode & ETM_MODE_EXCL_GUEST)
> +		trfcr = drvdata->trfcr & ~(TRFCR_ELx_ExTRE | TRFCR_ELx_E0TRE);
> +	else
> +		trfcr = etm4x_get_kern_user_filter(drvdata);
> +
> +	/* TRFCR_EL1 doesn't have CX so mask it out. */
> +	trfcr &= ~TRFCR_EL2_CX;

Here we are using the Guest "Virtual time" for the trace, which could be 
different from that of the "host" (if the trace covers both). Thus 
correlating the trace could be difficult if someone wants to do that.

We could switch to using Physical time, for the guest trace always,
matching the host time for correlating the events. (Assuming we are not
a Guest Hypervisor).

Rest looks fine to me.

> +	kvm_etm_set_guest_trfcr(trfcr);
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE
> @@ -655,6 +679,12 @@ static int etm4_parse_event_config(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>   	if (attr->exclude_user)
>   		config->mode = ETM_MODE_EXCL_USER;
>   
> +	if (attr->exclude_host)
> +		config->mode |= ETM_MODE_EXCL_HOST;
> +
> +	if (attr->exclude_guest)
> +		config->mode |= ETM_MODE_EXCL_GUEST;
> +
>   	/* Always start from the default config */
>   	etm4_set_default_config(config);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> index 20e2e4cb7614..3f170599822f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ enum etm_impdef_type {
>    * @s_ex_level: Secure ELs where tracing is supported.
>    */
>   struct etmv4_config {
> -	u32				mode;
> +	u64				mode;
>   	u32				pe_sel;
>   	u32				cfg;
>   	u32				eventctrl0;
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h
> index 767076e07970..727dd27ba800 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
>   
>   #define ETM_MODE_EXCL_KERN	BIT(30)
>   #define ETM_MODE_EXCL_USER	BIT(31)
> +#define ETM_MODE_EXCL_HOST	BIT(32)
> +#define ETM_MODE_EXCL_GUEST	BIT(33)
> +

nit: Some day, we should move to using the "event->attrs" directly, than 
translating them to these values.

Suzuki