Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:30:19 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@sberdevices.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] vsock/test: SO_RCVLOWAT + deferred credit
 update test
Message-ID: <tbvwohgvrc6kvlsyap3sk5zqww5q6schsu4szx7e23wgg7pvb3@e7xa5mg5inul>
References: <20231108072004.1045669-1-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
 <20231108072004.1045669-3-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
 <zukasb6k7ogta33c2wik6cgadg2rkacestat7pkexd45u53swh@ovso3hafta77>
 <923a6149-3bd5-c5b4-766d-8301f9e7484a@salutedevices.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <923a6149-3bd5-c5b4-766d-8301f9e7484a@salutedevices.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:12:38AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
>On 15.11.2023 14:11, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 10:20:04AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> This adds test which checks, that updating SO_RCVLOWAT value also sends
>>
>> You can avoid "This adds", and write just "Add test ...".
>>
>> See https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
>>
>> ??? Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
>> ??? instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
>> ??? to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
>> ??? its behaviour.
>>
>> Also in the other patch.
>>
>>> credit update message. Otherwise mutual hungup may happen when receiver
>>> didn't send credit update and then calls 'poll()' with non default
>>> SO_RCVLOWAT value (e.g. waiting enough bytes to read), while sender
>>> waits for free space at receiver's side.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>>> index c1f7bc9abd22..c71b3875fd16 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>>> @@ -1180,6 +1180,132 @@ static void test_stream_shutrd_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>>> ????close(fd);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#define RCVLOWAT_CREDIT_UPD_BUF_SIZE??? (1024 * 128)
>>> +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE??? (1024 * 64)
>>
>> What about adding a comment like the one in the cover letter about
>> dependency with kernel values?
>>
>> Please add it also in the commit description.
>>
>> I'm thinking if we should move all the defines that depends on the
>> kernel in some special header.
>
>IIUC it will be new header file in tools/testing/vsock, which includes such defines. At
>this moment in will contain only VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE. Idea is that such defines

So this only works on the virtio transport though, not the other
transports, right? (but maybe the others don't have this problem, so
it's fine).

>are not supposed to use by user (so do not move it to uapi headers), but needed by tests
>to check kernel behaviour. Please correct me if i'm wrong.

Right!
Maybe if it's just one, we can leave it there for now, but with a
comment on top explaining where it comes.

Thanks,
Stefano