Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:24:04 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] PCI: qcom: Clean up ASPM comment
Message-ID: <20231117105404.GR250770@thinkpad>
References: <20231114135553.32301-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <20231114135553.32301-5-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <20231117103227.GM250770@thinkpad>
 <ZVdE6nqanqcaL8sO@hovoldconsulting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZVdE6nqanqcaL8sO@hovoldconsulting.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:02:27PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:55:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Break up the newly added ASPM comment so that it fits within the soft 80
> > > character limit and becomes more readable.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I think we discussed (80column soft limit for comments) in the past, but I don't
> > think breaking here makes the comment more readable.
> 
> The coding style clearly states:
> 
> 	The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80 columns.
> 
> 	Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible chunks,
> 	unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
> 	not hide information.
> 
> Going beyond 80 chars may sometimes be warranted for code, but the
> exception is not intended for comments.
> 

Breaking the comment here is indeed making it hard to read. It's just one word
that needs to be broken if we go by 80 column limit and I won't prefer that,
sorry!

- Mani

> Johan

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்