Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b130:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id az48csp442765rdb; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE71P7aAhPNp2uUin4o1Lkzwfk7a1SVw1oWbSjmdu1EMbaAv3ksDshbuOSUscyr35CXC4HP X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8542:b0:1c3:1f0c:fb82 with SMTP id d2-20020a170902854200b001c31f0cfb82mr9555925plo.41.1700220498188; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700220498; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SnJNYcLMNdcxb/S30JtPUVzxIEorwFEELLPibmWMqpjrlPvh3rrQCgbNWOJTgexm93 EWlAgfWF5XSRVJ02mYSd6X4Dw7RKpkn6CIIXitRtLSNdiLLCOmISGcX5KPOxamnL2/VM h55hQReDEGU0uIf9yOQeP0O+OQXZ1CAOoEwLqc+JUzj1zzQsGD9q6gMBPsr6fhCywVZh OJc6dQOhTL4rkTwGuSivR6I15TVm9B2FFm7lDy4EtFEoXhk5gjP1xP01/0i6Wj1WXLq2 J0qfa5ugHNrvea3rNYzuKWJJtGg/W9G2xqhIvGhCBkvVce/y2WfVYwhzTGzL8L2eUGTR rrrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :organization:autocrypt:from:references:cc:to:content-language :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=CUXZ21s3tmdjDEStIWavtexWFfbCwQHlYn8virxNDas=; fh=VhymTa95gka4XYsV5f5oZIfgckaSVSTbiW5hakNJYAM=; b=qLSufLxZymnlSxHdStCWqGKmh5fA6X/FiUWRPUZ4i98DGR1QY6zffEdH0yCCNLji57 RaELvUFJQbpgALwsLhuq4ffW0l3MEnQ0ABYdaoLeTwF+FwpMao89eQNBueT+Cjqrf840 /Vwo8tfFQtwNCF95ru0dHBYY1pcV5Y3bvoyImxIREreEXYxkL4dJ8LzykejGIUiPcHr5 S0n+yXoMVFH8pLI+K7giMpL2GmEDZ4PHtk+wEpxHE/S3Qo4llZoGNxH/FlI3/Y7+mMcQ y3SNeC60somOLuCxbGxo29pHkWDp91ypsuDaoxv7HvLqx/TNhEJWMvH4Qn7zy1PFxxtk u0Jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RB0XbHeo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from snail.vger.email (snail.vger.email. [23.128.96.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jk4-20020a170903330400b001c4329b77bfsi1545626plb.123.2023.11.17.03.28.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RB0XbHeo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by snail.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041548288CAF; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at snail.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343584AbjKQL2R (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 06:28:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36456 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230379AbjKQL2Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 06:28:16 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970B6EA for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1700220491; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=CUXZ21s3tmdjDEStIWavtexWFfbCwQHlYn8virxNDas=; b=RB0XbHeo9io0+IFL6QDbKsKRwwRt8W6hobEimA/CX/vhQ1LkD2+mfQOr2Gk6z43O21vTSK Xyd1pKBce+m7VBlwI4uNAV1D4OT0UySzJVAhRlGOvnP4Q3GAVAWFVFmaOf5KXRl7KuCEnv roFTy9HGfWsQxLPBNjzpXCZapjWiTdc= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-368-TLcfMqR-OPqVIjmlTVU4sA-1; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 06:28:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: TLcfMqR-OPqVIjmlTVU4sA-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c50255b905so18194491fa.0 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700220489; x=1700825289; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CUXZ21s3tmdjDEStIWavtexWFfbCwQHlYn8virxNDas=; b=q7Yq3MG2/cxTwbzkRmsjsiXdxCrIuZkUJZiRuiG0VfvxOzuyl6AS+WqNMj7vurwGph XF/YnvSuKxxxbZBPZ26AkWbpZEZ2cduyXc9P6PkGtshn0tsSIghmJpa34nnA6cdUk93r Y402nqBuPTaAcgOArfkjvsTZbGsqPDvYaZdxu/KGxuahcoxUkzlbWxGLfuUDX+Idko9k sPH3g+XM5A4B5hAnpjPLnpof5/qwLfLe22A8rTE+moflF6HavYbtpctk1hPN1MVtHPi9 ijCcO+UwMbiIfUeKaLNxIQlyI4XdvPQFomyVCYwnY/3nzQ1QOKwDASyxaPqPFLh3m5lD VoKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YztG5iP3KictntjLR00WErKi1hT3PnqSSbGvzlkzCOkZjosfaG6 CNhz7g4eEJnTdaXGZW1uL3bblw8XU3Oj3jp1Nkm9FoY0b3gLXvBYIVFL4RilsIfIIs0n9KqI9+j 4GyXXdBD80NgPdHsVqJ7jyCRL X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3994:b0:506:899d:1989 with SMTP id j20-20020a056512399400b00506899d1989mr17221042lfu.44.1700220488927; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3994:b0:506:899d:1989 with SMTP id j20-20020a056512399400b00506899d1989mr17221027lfu.44.1700220488475; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c721:4400:d83c:42bd:326a:8b05? (p200300cbc7214400d83c42bd326a8b05.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c721:4400:d83c:42bd:326a:8b05]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y18-20020adfee12000000b003200c918c81sm2008508wrn.112.2023.11.17.03.28.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8c7f1a2f-57d2-4f20-abb2-394c7980008e@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:28:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC V3 PATCH] arm64: mm: swap: save and restore mte tags for large folios Content-Language: en-US To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: steven.price@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.com, shy828301@gmail.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, willy@infradead.org, xiang@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, yuzhao@google.com References: <20231114014313.67232-1-v-songbaohua@oppo.com> <864489b3-5d85-4145-b5bb-5d8a74b9b92d@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (snail.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:28:17 -0800 (PST) On 17.11.23 01:15, Barry Song wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 7:47 AM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 5:36 PM David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> >>> On 15.11.23 21:49, Barry Song wrote: >>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:16 PM David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 14.11.23 02:43, Barry Song wrote: >>>>>> This patch makes MTE tags saving and restoring support large folios, >>>>>> then we don't need to split them into base pages for swapping out >>>>>> on ARM64 SoCs with MTE. >>>>>> >>>>>> arch_prepare_to_swap() should take folio rather than page as parameter >>>>>> because we support THP swap-out as a whole. >>>>>> >>>>>> Meanwhile, arch_swap_restore() should use page parameter rather than >>>>>> folio as swap-in always works at the granularity of base pages right >>>>>> now. >>>>> >>>>> ... but then we always have order-0 folios and can pass a folio, or what >>>>> am I missing? >>>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> you missed the discussion here: >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGsJ_4yXjex8txgEGt7+WMKp4uDQTn-fR06ijv4Ac68MkhjMDw@mail.gmail.com/ >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGsJ_4xmBAcApyK8NgVQeX_Znp5e8D4fbbhGguOkNzmh1Veocg@mail.gmail.com/ >>> >>> Okay, so you want to handle the refault-from-swapcache case where you get a >>> large folio. >>> >>> I was mislead by your "folio as swap-in always works at the granularity of >>> base pages right now" comment. >>> >>> What you actually wanted to say is "While we always swap in small folios, we >>> might refault large folios from the swapcache, and we only want to restore >>> the tags for the page of the large folio we are faulting on." >>> >>> But, I do if we can't simply restore the tags for the whole thing at once >>> at make the interface page-free? >>> >>> Let me elaborate: >>> >>> IIRC, if we have a large folio in the swapcache, the swap entries/offset are >>> contiguous. If you know you are faulting on page[1] of the folio with a >>> given swap offset, you can calculate the swap offset for page[0] simply by >>> subtracting from the offset. >>> >>> See page_swap_entry() on how we perform this calculation. >>> >>> >>> So you can simply pass the large folio and the swap entry corresponding >>> to the first page of the large folio, and restore all tags at once. >>> >>> So the interface would be >>> >>> arch_prepare_to_swap(struct folio *folio); >>> void arch_swap_restore(struct page *folio, swp_entry_t start_entry); >>> >>> I'm sorry if that was also already discussed. >> >> This has been discussed. Steven, Ryan and I all don't think this is a good >> option. in case we have a large folio with 16 basepages, as do_swap_page >> can only map one base page for each page fault, that means we have >> to restore 16(tags we restore in each page fault) * 16(the times of page faults) >> for this large folio. >> >> and still the worst thing is the page fault in the Nth PTE of large folio >> might free swap entry as that swap has been in. >> do_swap_page() >> { >> /* >> * Remove the swap entry and conditionally try to free up the swapcache. >> * We're already holding a reference on the page but haven't mapped it >> * yet. >> */ >> swap_free(entry); >> } >> >> So in the page faults other than N, I mean 0~N-1 and N+1 to 15, you might access >> a freed tag. > > And David, one more information is that to keep the parameter of > arch_swap_restore() unchanged as folio, > i actually tried an ugly approach in rfc v2: > > +void arch_swap_restore(swp_entry_t entry, struct folio *folio) > +{ > + if (system_supports_mte()) { > + /* > + * We don't support large folios swap in as whole yet, but > + * we can hit a large folio which is still in swapcache > + * after those related processes' PTEs have been unmapped > + * but before the swapcache folio is dropped, in this case, > + * we need to find the exact page which "entry" is mapping > + * to. If we are not hitting swapcache, this folio won't be > + * large > + */ > + struct page *page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry)); > + mte_restore_tags(entry, page); > + } > +} > > And obviously everybody in the discussion hated it :-) > I can relate :D > i feel the only way to keep API unchanged using folio is that we > support restoring PTEs > all together for the whole large folio and we support the swap-in of > large folios. This is > in my list to do, I will send a patchset based on Ryan's large anon > folios series after a > while. till that is really done, it seems using page rather than folio > is a better choice. I think just restoring all tags and remembering for a large folio that they have been restored might be the low hanging fruit. But as always, devil is in the detail :) -- Cheers, David / dhildenb