Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35;
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:35:49 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
        oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>, ying.huang@intel.com,
        feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [iov_iter] c9eec08bac: vm-scalability.throughput
 -16.9% regression
Message-ID: <20231117113549.GBZVdQFQ7VrfsPd9mV@fat_crate.local>
References: <20231116154406.GDZVY4xmFvRQt0wGGE@fat_crate.local>
 <202311061616.cd495695-oliver.sang@intel.com>
 <3865842.1700061614@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <CAHk-=whM-cEwAsLtKsf5dYwV7nDTaRv1bUKLVBstMAQBug24uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wjCUckvZUQf7gqp2ziJUWxVpikM_6srFdbcNdBJTxExRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wjhs6uuedgz-7HbcPtirEq+vvjJBY-M2zyteJwBhOMZhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231115190938.GGZVUXcuUjI3i1JRAB@fat_crate.local>
 <CAHk-=wh0TcXyGmKHfs+Xe=5Sd5bNn=NNV9CEtOy_tbyHAAmk9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <232440.1700153046@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <232440.1700153046@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 04:44:06PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> If you wanted this patch trying, I get the following numbers:
> 
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 9950 uS, stddev 40 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 9950 uS, stddev 53 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec: avg 9973 uS, stddev 69 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 9793 uS, stddev 28 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 9800 uS, stddev 41 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_bvec_split: avg 9804 uS, stddev 16 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 10122 uS, stddev 4403 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 9757 uS, stddev 1516 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_kvec: avg 9909 uS, stddev 2694 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 10526 uS, stddev 52 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 10529 uS, stddev 48 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray: avg 10532 uS, stddev 63 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 10468 uS, stddev 23 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 10469 uS, stddev 157 uS
>  iov_kunit_benchmark_xarray_to_bvec: avg 10471 uS, stddev 163 uS

Hmm, stupid question: are those results better than without that
oneliner?

I don't see those same numbers done without this patch - maybe I can't
find them in the thread or so...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette