Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 09:54:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 09:54:26 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:15370 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 09:54:17 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 15:04:40 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Linus Torvalds" at Dec 26, 2001 04:17:11 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Because it's small, and if it wasn't there, we'd have to have the small > "rootfs" anyway (which basically duplicated ramfs functionality). Can ramfs=N longer term actually come back to be "use __init for the RAM fs functions". That would seem to address any space issues even the most embedded fanatic has. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/