Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758715AbXK0KjS (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:39:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754364AbXK0KjJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:39:09 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:38138 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869AbXK0KjI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:39:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:38:46 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: Roland McGrath , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step Message-ID: <20071127103846.GF6286@elte.hu> References: <20071125215507.4B89226F8C5@magilla.localdomain> <20071127005329.9dfcf473.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071127005329.9dfcf473.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1404 Lines: 32 * Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:55:07 -0800 (PST) Roland McGrath wrote: > > > This defines the new macro arch_has_single_step() in linux/ptrace.h, > > a default for when asm/ptrace.h does not define it. It declares the > > new user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions. > > This is not used yet, but paves the way to harmonize on this > > interface for the arch-specific calls on all machines. > > I think I'll duck this lot for now in view of the (relatively small) > amount of followup. > > I did do an experimental will-it-apply and got a tremendous number of > rejects against the x86 git tree, almost all of which went away when > `patch -l' was used. Seems that someone has gone on a whitespace > rampage through arch/x86/ia32/ptrace32.c and arch/x86/ia32/ptrace64.c. > > That's kinda/sorta OK, but `patch -l' is a bit more inclined to > misplace hunks and it's all a bit risky. actually, Thomas tried a tentative merge two days ago or so and the result was pretty OK and functional. I'll try to do a more formal merge and see what comes up. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/