Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757930AbXK0LJz (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:09:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751204AbXK0LJq (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:09:46 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:33831 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751112AbXK0LJq (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:09:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:09:10 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Balbir Singh , Dipankar Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] sched: group scheduler related patches (V4) Message-ID: <20071127110910.GB16273@elte.hu> References: <20071119123051.GC28777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119131201.GB31491@elte.hu> <20071119150312.GA2365@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119152258.GB31426@elte.hu> <20071119160647.GV3359@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119190057.GA12650@elte.hu> <20071126050044.GA5304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071126050905.GF5304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071126202836.GA17012@elte.hu> <20071127050652.GA20083@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071127050652.GA20083@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1049 Lines: 24 * Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > the first SCHED_RR priority is 1, not 0 - so this call will always fail. > > Thanks for spotting this bug and rest of your review comments. > > Here's V4 of the patchset, aimed at improving fairness of cpu > bandwidth allocation for task groups. thanks, it looks good - but the fact that we are at v4 of the patchset underlines the point that this is more of a v2.6.25 patchset than a v2.6.24 one. Group fairness certainly works fine enough in most setups and we are late into the v2.6.24 -rc stage. We'll merge this patchset (or any later versions of it) into v2.6.25 for sure, so distros that happen to base things off v2.6.24 can pick up your patches just fine. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/