Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Message-ID: <af2d08ab-54c3-4066-9c28-18e96de8643a@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Nov 2023 20:53:33 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc:     Phillip Susi <phill@thesusis.net>,
        Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux AMDGPU <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
References: <87edgv4x3i.fsf@vps.thesusis.net>
 <559d0fa5-953a-4a97-b03b-5eb1287c83d8@leemhuis.info>
 <CAPM=9tw-8pQWFso0zuLqpsqd5BSHWtc4As9ttdjY-DDr70EMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZVoMklvIVClr_IIH@archie.me>
 <9195ca1f-1d72-4616-8bdf-62f9f5c636b9@leemhuis.info>
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9195ca1f-1d72-4616-8bdf-62f9f5c636b9@leemhuis.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/19/23 20:48, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 19.11.23 14:24, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> AFAIK commit c07bf1636f0005 ("MAINTAINERS: Update the GPU Scheduler email")
>> doesn't seem to do with this regression as it doesn't change any amdgpu code
>> that may introduce the regression.
> 
> Bagas, sorry for being blunt here, I know you mean well. But I feel the
> need to say the following in the open, as this otherwise falls back on
> me and regression tracking.
> 
> Stating the above is not very helpful, as Dave for sure will know.
> Telling Phillip that he likely can skip that commit might have been
> something different. But I guess even for most users that are able to do
> a bisection it's obvious and maybe not worth pointing out.
> 

I was scratching my itch then when replying. Thanks anyway.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara