Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231115165001.2932350-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdbDny8X3WB_qJ4h_vbwrjno5ytAtNMgTeXg4jpegdUH2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbDny8X3WB_qJ4h_vbwrjno5ytAtNMgTeXg4jpegdUH2w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:06:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McZJzdj04Ckf_ygDhWNN2JcbTfY+yefOZSYx_nTE_Jpjg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: don't use gpiod_to_chip()
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:43=E2=80=AFPM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro=
.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.p=
l> wrote:
>
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Let's start working towards removing gpiod_to_chip() from the kernel.
> > Start with pinctrl. The first patch should go through the GPIO tree
> > and become available through an immutable tag so that we can get more
> > conversions in this cycle elsewhere.
>
> Fair enough, maybe an immutable branch with all three patches?
> Probably best to merga all three into both subsystems I think.
>

Nah, I don't think I need to pollute the GPIO tree with every pinctrl
patch. It's enough to just merge the first one into GPIO and you do
the same in pinctrl.

Bart

> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij