Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:48:05 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     =?UTF-8?B?S8O2cnk=?= Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>,
        Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 07/16] net_tstamp: Add TIMESTAMPING SOFTWARE
 and HARDWARE mask
Message-ID: <20231120084805.5f012a40@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20231120100549.22c83bd0@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
References: <20231114-feature_ptp_netnext-v7-0-472e77951e40@bootlin.com>
        <20231114-feature_ptp_netnext-v7-7-472e77951e40@bootlin.com>
        <20231118182247.638c0feb@kernel.org>
        <20231120100549.22c83bd0@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:05:49 +0100 K=C3=B6ry Maincent wrote:
> > Does this really need to be in uAPI? =20
>=20
> I have put it in the same place as SOF_TIMESTAMPING_* flags but indeed I =
am not
> sure ethtool would need it.
> I can move it to include/linux/net_tstamp.h and we will move back to uapi=
 if
> we see that it is necessary. What do you think?

include/linux/net_tstamp.h sounds better to me, Willem may disagree..