Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38;
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of
 IOSF GPIO
In-Reply-To: <ZVfVsVDQ9j7nMsnW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
References: <20231103201831.1037416-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <e66638b0-bbad-4ac7-ad93-6fb0c6147005@redhat.com>
 <871qcqqa1k.fsf@intel.com> <ZVfVsVDQ9j7nMsnW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:28:37 +0200
Message-ID: <875y1vo0x6.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 17 Nov 2023, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Ok, this now has been testen on both a BYT and a CHT device which
>> > actually use GPIO controls in their MIPI sequences so this
>> > series is:
>> >
>> > Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> >
>> > And the code of the entire series also looks good to me:
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> >
>> > for the series.
>> 
>> Thanks Andy & Hans!
>> 
>> I'll merge this once the test results are in. The BAT results have been
>> a bit flaky recently, so needed to do a rerun.
>> 
>> That said, I'm not sure if we have any hardware in CI that would
>> actually exercise the modifications, so in that sense I trust Hans'
>> testing much more.
>
> Thank you!
> Should I fix checkpatch warnings CI reported about?

Nah, they're benign.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel