Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
Message-ID: <20858eb9-a4d0-41be-ad1d-2a5f2d2fa0de@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:42:18 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [V14 5/8] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Disable branch generation in nVHE
 guests
Content-Language: en-US
To:     James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com
References: <20231114051329.327572-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
 <20231114051329.327572-6-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
 <f2661879-636c-1865-0e1c-60d8e11f80f0@arm.com>
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <f2661879-636c-1865-0e1c-60d8e11f80f0@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 11/14/23 14:46, James Clark wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/11/2023 05:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Disable the BRBE before we enter the guest, saving the status and enable it
>> back once we get out of the guest. This is just to avoid capturing records
>> in the guest kernel/userspace, which would be confusing the samples.
>>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V14:
>>
>> - This is a new patch in the series
>>
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h  |  4 ++++
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c             |  6 +++++
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 68421c74283a..1faa0430d8dd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -449,6 +449,8 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
>>  	CNTHV_CVAL_EL2,
>>  	PMSCR_EL1,	/* Statistical profiling extension */
>>  	TRFCR_EL1,	/* Self-hosted trace filters */
>> +	BRBCR_EL1,	/* Branch Record Buffer Control Register */
>> +	BRBFCR_EL1,	/* Branch Record Buffer Function Control Register */
>>  
>>  	NR_SYS_REGS	/* Nothing after this line! */
>>  };
>> @@ -753,6 +755,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>  #define VCPU_HYP_CONTEXT	__vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(7))
>>  /* Save trace filter controls */
>>  #define DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRFCR	__vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(8))
>> +/* Save BRBE context if active  */
>> +#define DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_BRBE	__vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(9))
>>  
>>  /* SVE enabled for host EL0 */
>>  #define HOST_SVE_ENABLED	__vcpu_single_flag(sflags, BIT(0))
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> index 2ab41b954512..4055783c3d34 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>> @@ -354,6 +354,11 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  		    !(read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRBIDR_EL1) & TRBIDR_EL1_P))
>>  			vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE);
>>  	}
>> +
>> +	/* Check if we have BRBE implemented and available at the host */
>> +	if (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT) &&
>> +	    (read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1) & (BRBCR_ELx_E0BRE | BRBCR_ELx_ExBRE)))
>> +		vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_BRBE);
> 
> Isn't this supposed to just be the feature check? Whether BRBE is
> enabled or not is checked later in __debug_save_brbe() anyway.

Okay, will make it just a feature check via ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT.

> 
> It seems like it's possible to become enabled after this flag load part.

Agreed.

> 
>>  }
>>  
>>  void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> @@ -361,6 +366,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  	vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE);
>>  	vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE);
>>  	vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRFCR);
>> +	vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_BRBE);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void kvm_etm_set_guest_trfcr(u64 trfcr_guest)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
>> index 6174f710948e..e44a1f71a0f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
>> @@ -93,6 +93,38 @@ static void __debug_restore_trace(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt,
>>  		write_sysreg_s(ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, TRFCR_EL1), SYS_TRFCR_EL1);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void __debug_save_brbe(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
>> +{
>> +	ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBCR_EL1) = 0;
>> +	ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBFCR_EL1) = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* Check if the BRBE is enabled */
>> +	if (!(ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBCR_EL1) & (BRBCR_ELx_E0BRE | BRBCR_ELx_ExBRE)))
>> +		return;
> 
> Doesn't this always fail, the host BRBCR_EL1 value was just cleared on
> the line above.

Agreed, this error might have slipped in while converting to ctxt_sys_reg().

> 
> Also, you need to read the register to determine if it was enabled or

Right

> not, so you might as well always store the real value, rather than 0 in
> the not enabled case.

But if it is not enabled - why store the real value ?

> 
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Prohibit branch record generation while we are in guest.
>> +	 * Since access to BRBCR_EL1 and BRBFCR_EL1 is trapped, the
>> +	 * guest can't modify the filtering set by the host.
>> +	 */
>> +	ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBCR_EL1) = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
>> +	ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBFCR_EL1) = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1)
>> +	write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
>> +	write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
> 
> Why does SYS_BRBFCR_EL1 need to be saved and restored? Only
> BRBCR_ELx_E0BRE and BRBCR_ELx_ExBRE need to be cleared to disable BRBE.

Right, just thought both brbcr, and brbfcr system registers represent
current BRBE state (besides branch records), in a more comprehensive
manner, although none would be changed from inside the guest.

> 
>> +	isb();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __debug_restore_brbe(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBCR_EL1) || !ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBFCR_EL1))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Restore BRBE controls */
>> +	write_sysreg_s(ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBCR_EL1), SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
>> +	write_sysreg_s(ctxt_sys_reg(host_ctxt, BRBFCR_EL1), SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
>> +	isb();
>> +}
>> +
>>  void __debug_save_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt,
>>  				    struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt)
>>  {
>> @@ -102,6 +134,10 @@ void __debug_save_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt,
>>  
>>  	if (vcpu_get_flag(host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRFCR))
>>  		__debug_save_trace(host_ctxt, guest_ctxt);
>> +
>> +	/* Disable BRBE branch records */
>> +	if (vcpu_get_flag(host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_BRBE))
>> +		__debug_save_brbe(host_ctxt);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void __debug_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> @@ -116,6 +152,8 @@ void __debug_restore_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt,
>>  		__debug_restore_spe(host_ctxt);
>>  	if (vcpu_get_flag(host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRFCR))
>>  		__debug_restore_trace(host_ctxt, guest_ctxt);
>> +	if (vcpu_get_flag(host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_BRBE))
>> +		__debug_restore_brbe(host_ctxt);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void __debug_switch_to_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)