Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760542AbXK1AQ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:16:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754505AbXK1AQv (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:16:51 -0500 Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:60662 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753922AbXK1AQu (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:16:50 -0500 Message-ID: <474CB44B.40109@o2.pl> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:20:27 +0100 From: Jarek Poplawski User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular References: <20071125172237.GC6658@kernel.dk> <20071127070912.GB1735@ff.dom.local> <20071127164723.GA3406@stusta.de> <474C9714.1080308@o2.pl> <20071127225334.GI3406@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20071127225334.GI3406@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1533 Lines: 50 Adrian Bunk wrote, On 11/27/2007 11:53 PM: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:15:48PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > Most Google hits are about abortion. > > The fact that people use this term in some completely different > context does not give it the meaning you implied it had. > > Oh, and this right of choice also does not exist in Poland... Anyway, your later arguments could suggest you've understood, what I've meant. And maybe abortion isn't bad association here... ... > As one of the most active code removers in the kernel [1], I can tell > you what actually happens in practice: ... > It's always surprising how many people complain when you deprecate or > remove a choice B that choice A wouldn't work for them, and who had > never reported their problems before since choice B worked for them... Of course, all these choices should be reasonably limited, so the opinions of users and maintainers should be always considered. But, I was rather against something else: removing some maybe not very popular, but still not buggy options, only to save a few kilobytes or maintainers' time. > [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/247582/ My congratulations! Of course, removing is something necessary, but I wish you many problems! (== many users) Thanks, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/