Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:35:35 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
Cc:     Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
        Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] USB: dwc3: qcom: fix wakeup after probe deferral
Message-ID: <ZVzANwndkuzhBOiO@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <20231120161607.7405-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <20231120161607.7405-3-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <pgmtla6j3dshuq5zdxstszbkkssxcthtzelv2etcbrlstdw4nu@wixz6v5dfpum>
 <3ff65t36p6n3k7faw2z75t2vfi6rb5p64x7wqosetsksbhhwli@5xaxnm7zz4tu>
 <ZVx1wRefjNaN0byk@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <0b627853-78fb-4320-84e4-f88695ac6a9e@quicinc.com>
 <ZVy1kAslWYOQ6n9q@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <ac838113-501a-4f2b-b858-c59f586a9f35@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ac838113-501a-4f2b-b858-c59f586a9f35@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:38:18PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
> >>    Just one query. Even if it wakes up after closing the lid and removing
> >> the mouse, wouldn't pm suspend be triggered again later by the system
> >> once it sees that usb is also good to be suspended again ? I presume a
> >> laptop form factor would be having this facility of re-trigerring
> >> suspend. Let me know if this is not the case.
> > 
> > No, we generally don't use opportunistic suspend (e.g. unlike android)
> > so the laptop will not suspend again.
> > 
> > So this is an actual bug affecting, for example, the Lenovo ThinkPad
> > X13s.

> Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking in android perspective 
> only. But if we don't wake up the system upon disconnect, wouldn't the 
> controller still be under the assumption that device is connected when 
> it is actually not and only realise this when we resume later ?

Correct.

Johan