Received: by 2002:a05:7412:40d:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id 13csp485001rdf; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:57:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEAjhtTLz176WYmPEYQuwnRLROTOpjlxun1I1fx2Y9ORSXFcc1kk6yL33isK3bHR4SfThYk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:2324:b0:187:27d3:1573 with SMTP id n36-20020a056a20232400b0018727d31573mr6892669pzc.22.1700582231115; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:57:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700582231; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NH6Z0ZyAVHrPAhSbL3QTi8wAjQjKyiw9TMdYUXZp7hX7RGsu7h5C2sUxJ51umo7ElF sKGdnbGintkW+cwUYw+In/8mmZnWDO4QEotxGSB00/XFMbVeDMMpCcPOUhyE3lW7WTw4 Wroz4S5rdHic6riowxjBDNyYu9fkjB+ExRtlDaXi4qk/mcKf34HDGdhmE5QEw6HDRbD+ 5XBTvVhVjo0s+0ZgnayTHLyyjsth263dB1768bdik2mi15yWwGnhXvFUP7ZdDgC2QQ9h J4ybT8e9XA+qcRIqaZtV62CP37UziWsS6a/Ymuswyow/jH3Ndmx2zkJwi7q+7bIBhuVc h4zA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=80EZ213OrCea2twDbtlACUFt5ptljgeCeZimNrCz+XA=; fh=Kwd/Q9e5qoRUJKNzmi1/wd/K46eUPZl2UUgdq7hjVMQ=; b=VlAMBlckmXfkEd9zM0oqvS7IJSNKknfT8yhl3uDzNGWJmTMo2pE4Bs6CBpS7QUK/uN pXRmIRCbW1us5dx79cW9fLz0ycos527VM0TfmoRGCiXsOy5A41jgDWJLONGQHBMFI4iM 7NNem01zLlM5bDbiNazozQjQY0QEcaIMvNQE4bWOj5JposVVipryB/IJshlOh5YZtmeq y1i19t6GUcVexWWMD2xgRNr3z0cT5DYNjPgYnlWg3EciOwmlBQFnGvBrVqVXDNPeS5XR hHba+2MNK1P0NEz1wHRTcXgsYQh5Za+RbKwEkZHfLVZj4yXbbPgmWjrGdkTOv5WFD3kU Xymg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from lipwig.vger.email (lipwig.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w22-20020a63f516000000b005b93bfe91f3si10501443pgh.577.2023.11.21.07.57.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:57:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by lipwig.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F18C804AF7A; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:56:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at lipwig.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234243AbjKUP4b (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:56:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232517AbjKUP4a (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:56:30 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B68187; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:56:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E20FEC; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com (FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.34.196]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D785A3F6C4; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:56:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:56:22 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Ian Rogers Cc: Marc Zyngier , Hector Martin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Asahi Linux Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Perf (userspace) broken on big.LITTLE systems since v6.5 Message-ID: References: <08f1f185-e259-4014-9ca4-6411d5c1bc65@marcan.st> <86pm03z0kw.wl-maz@kernel.org> <86o7fnyvrq.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lipwig.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (lipwig.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:56:47 -0800 (PST) On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:41:17AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > Hi Marc, Hi Ian, > I'm unclear if you are running a newer perf tool on an older kernel or > not. In any case I'll assume the kernel and perf tool versions match. > In Linux 6.6 this patch was added to the ARM PMU: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c?id=5c816728651ae425954542fed64d21d40cb75a9f > > My guess is that the apple_icestorm_pmu requires a similar patch. The apple_icestorm_pmu PMU driver uses the arm_pmu framework, so it's using that code (since v6.6). > The perf tool is supposed to not use extended types when they aren't > supported: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/util/pmus.c?h=perf-tools-next#n532 How does that is_event_supported() check actually work? I suspect that's giving the wrong answer. Regardless, I think the tool is doing something semantically wrong, see below. > So I share your confusion as to why something broke. > > PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE is a legacy type where there are hardcoded type and > config values that correspond to an event. The PMU driver turns legacy > events into the real types. On BIG.little systems if the legacy events > are monitoring a task a different event is needed for each PMU (ie >1 > event). In your example you are monitoring 'ls', a task, and so > different cycles events are necessary. In the high 32-bits (the > extended type) the PMU is identified. I think the interesting thing here is that the tool is mapping events with an explicit PMU into legacy PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events, which is the opposite direction than intended. Regardless of whether PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events can be targetted to a specific PMU, if the user has requested to use a specific PMU we should be using that PMU and related event namespace. Marc's command line was: sudo taskset -c 0 ./perf stat -vvv \ -e apple_icestorm_pmu/cycles/ \ -e apple_firestorm_pmu/cycles/ \ -e cycles \ ls ... and so the apple_*_pmu events should target their respective PMUs, and the plain 'cycles' event could legitimately be opened as a single PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE event, or split into two directed PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events targetting the two PMUs. However, thwe tool opens three (undirected?) PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events: Opening: apple_icestorm_pmu/cycles/ ------------------------------------------------------------ perf_event_attr: type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) size 136 config 0 (PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) sample_type IDENTIFIER read_format TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING disabled 1 inherit 1 enable_on_exec 1 exclude_guest 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ sys_perf_event_open: pid 1045843 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 3 Opening: apple_firestorm_pmu/cycles/ ------------------------------------------------------------ perf_event_attr: type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) size 136 config 0 (PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) sample_type IDENTIFIER read_format TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING disabled 1 inherit 1 enable_on_exec 1 exclude_guest 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ sys_perf_event_open: pid 1045843 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 4 Opening: cycles ------------------------------------------------------------ perf_event_attr: type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) size 136 config 0 (PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) sample_type IDENTIFIER read_format TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING disabled 1 inherit 1 enable_on_exec 1 exclude_guest 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ Mark.