Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:14:22 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     Jerry Shih <jerry.shih@sifive.com>
Cc:     paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        davem@davemloft.net, andy.chiu@sifive.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com,
        conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
        heiko@sntech.de, ardb@kernel.org, phoebe.chen@sifive.com,
        hongrong.hsu@sifive.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] RISC-V: crypto: add accelerated
 AES-CBC/CTR/ECB/XTS implementations
Message-ID: <20231122011422.GF2172@sol.localdomain>
References: <20231025183644.8735-1-jerry.shih@sifive.com>
 <20231025183644.8735-7-jerry.shih@sifive.com>
 <20231102051639.GF1498@sol.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231102051639.GF1498@sol.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:16:39PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > +	  Architecture: riscv64 using:
> > +	  - Zvbb vector extension (XTS)
> > +	  - Zvkb vector crypto extension (CTR/XTS)
> > +	  - Zvkg vector crypto extension (XTS)
> > +	  - Zvkned vector crypto extension
> 
> Maybe list Zvkned first since it's the most important one in this context.

BTW, I'd like to extend this request to the implementation names
(.cra_driver_name) and the names of the files as well.  I.e., instead of:

    aes-riscv64-zvkned
    aes-riscv64-zvkb-zvkned
    aes-riscv64-zvbb-zvkg-zvkned
    sha256-riscv64-zvkb-zvknha_or_zvknhb
    sha512-riscv64-zvkb-zvknhb

... we'd have:

    aes-riscv64-zvkned
    aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvkb
    aes-riscv64-zvkned-zvbb-zvkg
    sha256-riscv64-zvknha_or_zvknhb-zvkb
    sha512-riscv64-zvknhb-zvkb

and similarly for the cra_driver_name fields.

I think that's much more logical.  Do you agree?

- Eric