Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:33:32 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
        Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Pan Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] riscv: Add support for kernel-mode FPU
Message-ID: <ZV283NfE/K5zLXDD@infradead.org>
References: <20231122030621.3759313-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com>
 <20231122030621.3759313-2-samuel.holland@sifive.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231122030621.3759313-2-samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:05:13PM -0800, Samuel Holland wrote:
> +static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
> +{
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	fstate_save(current, task_pt_regs(current));
> +	csr_set(CSR_SSTATUS, SR_FS);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kernel_fpu_end(void)
> +{
> +	csr_clear(CSR_SSTATUS, SR_FS);
> +	fstate_restore(current, task_pt_regs(current));
> +	preempt_enable();
> +}

Is there any critical reason to inline these two?  I'd much rather see
them out of line and exported instead of the low-level helpers.