Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:27:22 +0800
From:   Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc:     Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/15] KVM: pfncache: include page offset in uhva and
 use it consistently
Message-ID: <ZV4PyvTBOohiRyLS@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
References: <20231121180223.12484-1-paul@xen.org>
 <20231121180223.12484-8-paul@xen.org>
 <ZV3Bwghwz63LmgMu@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
 <b6b864e500cbb38f76739fcfb4dcc6e9c6705d0b.camel@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <b6b864e500cbb38f76739fcfb4dcc6e9c6705d0b.camel@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 09:12:18AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 16:54 +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -259,13 +258,25 @@ static int __kvm_gpc_refresh(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa,
> > >                         ret = -EFAULT;
> > >                         goto out;
> > >                 }
> > > +
> > > +               hva_change = true;
> > > +       } else {
> > > +               /*
> > > +                * No need to do any re-mapping if the only thing that has
> > > +                * changed is the page offset. Just page align it to allow the
> > > +                * new offset to be added in.
> > 
> > I don't understand how the uhva('s offset) could be changed when both gpa and
> > slot are not changed. Maybe I have no knowledge of xen, but in later
> > patch you said your uhva would never change...
> 
> It doesn't change on a normal refresh with kvm_gpc_refresh(), which is
> just for revalidation after memslot changes or MMU invalidation.
> 
> But it can change if the gpc is being reinitialized with a new address
> (perhaps because the guest has made another hypercall to set the
> address, etc.)
> 
> That new address could happen to be in the *same* page as the previous

In this case, the lower bits of new gpa should be different to gpc->gpa,
so will hit "if (gpc->gpa != gpa ...)" branch.

And I see this comment is deleted in v9, which makes sense to me.

Thanks,
Yilun

> one. In fact the xen_shinfo_test explicitly tests that case, IIRC.
> 
> And kvm_gpc_activate() also happens to use __kvm_gpc_refresh()
> internally.