Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757641AbXK1SP2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754665AbXK1SPM (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:12 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46586 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753919AbXK1SPK (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:10 -0500 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Qpz9ARkpQo3EcPXigJNuAOXLE6TqWotqqC0+E3x wuYhv9CQHvJXyX Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:14:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Johannes Schindelin X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site To: Al Boldi cc: Rogan Dawes , git@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git guidance In-Reply-To: <200711282014.27299.a1426z@gawab.com> Message-ID: References: <20071127235237.GF15227@1wt.eu> <474D70DD.4020601@dawes.za.net> <200711282014.27299.a1426z@gawab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1718 Lines: 48 Hi, On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Al Boldi wrote: > git@vger sometimes bounces, so let's leave lkml as backup. Fair enough. > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Rogan Dawes wrote: > > > Al Boldi wrote: > > > > Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > > It should not turn into an endless thread led by people who want > > > > > to redefine GIT's roadmap, but experience sharing helps a lot > > > > > with GIT. > > > > > > > > Well, now that you mentioned it, if there is one thing I dislike, > > > > it's for version control to start mutilating your sources. > > > > Version Control should be completely transparent. GIT isn't. > > > > > > Care to explain? Git is quite happy handling arbitrary binary > > > content, so I find it difficult to believe that it is changing your > > > source code in strange ways. > > > > It is nice of you to ask him to explain: Unless this handwaving claim > > is substantiated, it is quite hard to argue with. > > Sure, the problem with GIT is that it stores the sources inside a > backend container that is only accessible via GIT; iow, you can't > retrieve your sources directly / transparently. That is a very funny way to define a "transparent SCM". Are you complaining about SQL servers being "not transparent"? By that definition, no SCM, not even CVS, is transparent. Nothing short of unpacked directories of all versions (wasting a lot of disk space) would. IOW the issue you raised is a non-issue. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/